Live data from Hacker News

Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

anthropeum.com

31–40 of 49 posts

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#31
post #27

I wonder how many people are using external resources when playing this. I have a hard time believing that the average lumps so far to the right of the score distribution unless this game is played exclusively by anthropologists haha.

I scored above the median just getting the continent and millennium right. Admittedly I used knowledge about population density to pick the most likely spot, but that hardly makes me an anthropologist. I assume regular players will also pick up on patterns in where most artifacts are sourced from.

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#32
Great idea for a vibe coded project that is actually creative/original. Got in the top 4% as a professional historian. Would be interesting to see the professions of the people in the top .1 percent - is it people with Geoguessr type abilities or more like art historians and curators at the Met, I wonder?

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#33
post #14

Wonderful - thank you to the creator! Requests, just in case you are reading: * Make hints that prompt thinking and teach analysis (interesting!), not give answers (boring). For example, for the Inca ceramic depicting corn: 'The object depicts something familiar to you - where and when would that have been familiar to the people who made and used this?'; or for a silk painting, 'Where and when do you find these mater…

[dead]

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#36
post #35

I made this game! woohoo

Was there something in particular that inspired you to make it?

I collect artifacts/coins as a hobby, and I often come across things that are undocumented/unattributed. Saw the Met had an open access program and wanted to recreate that feeling with more artifacts:)

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#37
This is great. I suck, considering how much I like anthropology and history ... Would be nice to have access to other museum collections, considering the Met has a bias in collecting from such and such nation (at least i'm pretty sure, maybe less than the british museum ?). Anyway, I had a blast :).

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#38
post #27

I wonder how many people are using external resources when playing this. I have a hard time believing that the average lumps so far to the right of the score distribution unless this game is played exclusively by anthropologists haha.

I studied History of Art in school - long ago admittedly, but it was clearly helpful in identifying differences between eastern and western portraiture. It was, however, far less useful at helping me identify artifacts from Central Africa and Mesoamerica.

I used no external resources since that would defeat the purpose of this.

Given that, I placed in the 64th percentile based on a couple of really accurate matches (renaissance sculpture, fnar) and a lot that weren't terribly wrong.

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#39
(potential spoilers:)

How could anyone figure out the provenance of that rectangular gold object with the four semispheres?

Gold has been widespread and doesn't narrow it down much. I wondered if its abstract-ish design might be modern, but then it didn't seem worthwhile to the Met and I decided it might just be practical (I was somewhat right about practicality). I guessed that the fastners on the back were were post-Middle Ages.

Re: Anthropeum – Where in the world, and when, does this human artifact belong?

#40
The scoring is the same as a project from a year or two ago that used AI generated videos, I wonder if this a rework of that? I think this is a definite improvement, if so.

I think the "top nn%" is misleading if you do terribly, though. "Top 67%" sounds better than average, but a look at the graph shows that my inability to distinguish between locations of tribal art puts me well below average.

Post reply on HN