Live data from Hacker News

ICE to Pay Thomson Reuters $125M to Find Voter Fraud

404media.co

31–40 of 157 posts

Re: ICE to Pay Thomson Reuters $125M to Find Voter Fraud

#31
When I was young, I thought mandatory voting was silly. It made uninformed people vote. Well, certainly in this case, I was the uninformed person because seeing how non-mandatory voting works (in the US) should convinced everyone that voting should be mandatory.

The history of the US is one of voter suppression. Women couldn't vote. After Emancipation, barriers were put in to stop black people from voting (so-called "grandfather" laws). We got the Voting Rights Act for a reason. Many reasons actually.

All the way back in the Reagan era we had the Republican Party engaging in voter disenfranchisement with, for example, the Ballot Security Task Force [1]. This was part of the reason why we needed federal preclearance until John Roberts and his Heritage Foundation henchmen decided that it was impossible to prove racism or disenfrachisement.

We continue this by not only removing the voting rights of felons (which should be unconstitutional) but we pass around lists of names of felons and strike off people from electoral rolls for having names that sound similar to that of a felon from a completely different state.

There is no widespread voter fraud. There is widespread voter disenfranchisement. All of this is just a pretext for stealing elections. We'll se on January 3rd if the current House Speaker refuses to certify results and swear in new members when the Republicans lose in a landslide. Or we see more shenanigans like in the 2020 election to overturn the presidential election.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_Security_Task_Force

Re: ICE to Pay Thomson Reuters $125M to Find Voter Fraud

#35

I found it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_ph...

Because there are no consequences of Trump's actions, he would continue to commit offenses.

Neither Biden's administration, nor the judge presiding over Trump's crimes did what should have been done.

The checks and balances failed both when Trump was in power and when he was not in power.

Re: ICE to Pay Thomson Reuters $125M to Find Voter Fraud

#36
post #21

Is ICE the correct agency for voter fraud?

Whatever the conclusion of "is ICE the correct agency for..." the answer is no. But you use the brownshirts for things regular civil servants would gum up with protests and procedure adhering to the actual law.

Re: ICE to Pay Thomson Reuters $125M to Find Voter Fraud

#38
post #23

Has this always been ICE responsibility?

Of course not, but ICE is the weapon of choice. A loyal, armed goon squad seemingly unconstrained by law compared to other agencies.

And now the FBI has announced they will not investigate any crimes that ICE commits.

Re: ICE to Pay Thomson Reuters $125M to Find Voter Fraud

#39
This process has been carried out, publicly, a few times. Every time the results not only fail to support the current regime's narrative, they actively goes against it. So, the question becomes: "Who is getting kickbacks for this 'deal'?"

More importantly, how in the hell it this under the purview of ICE? Agencies and units have strictly outlined mission statements they are not supposed to go outside of. What kind of secret police nonsense it this?

EDIT: Word choice & spelling

Re: ICE to Pay Thomson Reuters $125M to Find Voter Fraud

#40
post #6

I reckon that if you replace "find" with "make", you might be closer to the truth about what this data will be used for.

So the fraud perpetrated here will be this administration denying people their right to vote?

My guess is the fraud they are looking for vs the fraud they find will not at all be related. If they find the fraud at all, it will be entirely the current administration at fault.
Post reply on HN