31–38 of 38 posts
This should inform entrepreneurs: people want unique and beautiful flowers. I don’t see why it’s not possible to do at least some modifications with gene editing methods.
What the world needs is more new and innovative invasive species that were cooked up in a lab to look cool :)
All from well-known brand SheilaDegisn
We talk too much about hallucination and too little about the more mundane elephant in the room that AI, whatever its effectiveness, will simply be used more for scam and deception than positive uses.
Just make scams illegal — problem solved.
But seriously, I wonder how much of the economy is scam activity?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I find it fascinating that this is a popular anti-bitcoin argument, but (often) the same people making that argument actually find AI useful. So they experience a mild case of cognitive dissonance.
The Bitcoin argument is usually paired with "there are no non-scam use cases which aren't better served by other methods/tech."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Bitcoin argument is usually paired with "there are no non-scam use cases which aren't better served by other methods/tech."
Which is an obvious falsehood for both bitcoin and AI.
What can bitcoin "obvious" uniquely do that cannot be done better by other coins / tokens out there ? (As in privacy tokens have a blockchain and privacy, stable coins have utility of actually being able to be used as a means of payment etc etc ) en
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is an obvious falsehood for both bitcoin and AI.
Obvious falsehood for AI. What can bitcoin "obvious" uniquely do that cannot be done better by other coins / tokens out there ? (As in privacy tokens have a blockchain and privacy, stable coins have utility of actually being able to be used as a means of payment etc etc ) en
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We're about to see our political campaigns flooded with fake videos, slander, fabrications, and misinformation. Used to be you could be relatively certain if something was a video it was too much effort to be photoshopped. Not true any more.
The same was true for photographs yet we survived following the invention of photoshop. The truth is that you don't even need video or photos to trick stupid people. Text alone allows for political campaigns flooded with slander, fabrications, and misinformation and some percentage of the population will fall for it. I'd say the best thing we can do is better educate the public to think critically and become media sa…
Words could be falsified, signatures and stamps could be falsified, witnesses could be bribed. Critical thinking is now back in vogue after a brief intermission.
When I work as a freelancer, I get a lot of requests lately to create fake AI manipulated images for scams. Especially requests to generate fake IDs using AI. Personally, I feel that there is a need for AI watermarks on image generation models, but at the same time, if watermarks become mandatory, it would effectively kill the business viability of those models. It feels like the same problem as guns and gun control.
may I ask the reason your clients don't just generate these things themselves?