The entire design looks very interesting, but from the outside and without domain expertise I find it very hard to assess if anything about this is actually real or just a large and well-executed product of an AI psychosis. The signs that this project is real are hard to verify: - Angel investment by FinFET inventor Chenming Hu [1] seems a big vote of confidence, but there is no independent confirmation of this anywh…
I also have another side project, thepantheon.ai. I think it's ok to have multiple talents. To make the world a much more interesting place. We talk to fabs. I am not allowed to expose any conversation. We don't need to prove to average Joe what we have. It's indeed teamwork to bring it into production, even with huge help from AI. It also takes expertise to make sure AI is correct. As a founder, it's more of a merit…
Of course that's okay, but do recognize that most blockchain projects in general and DAOs and NFTs specifically have been considered frauds or at the very least pipe dreams by many on this site from the beginning. And wider in tech society from the moment the hype was gone.
> We don't need to prove to average Joe what we have.
Of course you don't need to prove anyone anything, but it really can't hurt and there doesn't seem to be much effort in addressing the main issues. Not having anyone write about you also just seems like bad marketing: as you clearly are not in stealth mode, an extremely verbose public website stands oddly against no external coverage.
> It's indeed teamwork to bring it into production
So is or isn't the NanoGalaxy an actually physical, working device ready for a demo? (which isn't necessarily production, but somewhat close)