Live data from Hacker News

Everyone Is Wrong About AI Except Me

jasonpargin.substack.com

31–32 of 32 posts

Re: Everyone Is Wrong About AI Except Me

#31
post #9

This post makes a critical error. It is talking about sci-fi AI. Artificial Consciousness. What we have is, while useful for many things (with proper constraints), just prediction engines that behave like intelligence. Generating a sentence when specifically asked to do so is a far cry from independently pondering over your existence then picking up the God of Thunder's hammer. If anything, the public has been primed…

and when AI agents start tasking llms to build better llms on their own that then turn into better agents that then task automated robots to design better hardware then manufacture it and configure it and run agents that start tasking llms to build better llms on their own that etc at what point does it cease to become a simple mathematical function and start to become an "organism"?

If that ever starts happening, let us know.

I don't see any evidence that current LLMs even have a path to that.

Re: Everyone Is Wrong About AI Except Me

#32

Interesting first point. I'm reminded of Blade Runner, which definitively fits in the "robots are people too, you monster!" genre ... But the source material was the exact opposite. Philip K. Dick went out of the way to rub in that even if the robots could move you to tears with their art (Luba Luft), be a reassuring authority figure for years (Garland), or even appear vulnerable and afraid (Pris Stratton), they are…

> Most misunderstood PKD book by far.

Most had a different interpretation than you did.

Under the "Fallacy of Intention" theory of literary analysis, even Philip K Dick's intent isn't "the real meaning".

Regardless, "misunderstood" is at best a way to say "unpopular" or "overly simplistic". It isn't wrong, since there are no absolute facts; only opinions.

Post reply on HN