Live data from Hacker News

Markdy: Like Mermaid Diagrams, but for Motion

markdy.com

31–40 of 77 posts

Re: Markdy: Like Mermaid Diagrams, but for Motion

#31

This is both awful and essentially the future, By that I mean its raw now as its in the beginning but this gave me flashbacks to the flash era of the web that had so much creativity across it. Once you are able to add more assets in the place of emoji's this could really take off especially in the younger users. Instead of sending an emoji you'd instruct an LLM to create you one of these to send. Well done.

Macromedia Flash vibes.

Don’t stop.

Re: Markdy: Like Mermaid Diagrams, but for Motion

#32
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There have been too many ads for this site posted this month. 8 of your 10 recent comments are just site promotions, which is getting annoying. By the way, I don't really see the value here. Most of this could be vibe-coded and reimplemented in a day or two. It’s just an integration of existing NPM libraries.

My goal is to build the only app you need for reading technical documentation. I am working on it daily for the past 5 months, and almost every day I have a new feature which I want to share with HN people and try it out

Spam is not the way to win hearts and minds

Re: Markdy: Like Mermaid Diagrams, but for Motion

#35
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> zero-content Changing the default demo is a reasonable and actionable suggestion.

But not why .

You just need to be older than 12 to understand what is problematic about the demo. Just pointing it out was sufficient.

Re: Markdy: Like Mermaid Diagrams, but for Motion

#38
post #15

I suggest you change the demo. 1. Boys see girl 2. Boys fight over girl Creator could have chosen literally anything else to represent their product but instead went with an animation of boy emojis fighting over a girl emoji.

yeah... AI doesnt seem to make us more creative

Ironically I don't think AI is this tone deaf.

Re: Markdy: Like Mermaid Diagrams, but for Motion

#40
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No-one's mentioned that anything's sexist, or how. You're filling in the blanks to create content where there wasn't any.

The fact that EVERYBODY here sees it but you, tells you that perhaps you should take a step back and try to understand... it might be YOU who don't get it at all...

I think the poster gets it. As do I. And I do not believe either of us care all that much about the vocal minority.
Post reply on HN