Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Maybe colleges can just accept the best students If you want to see what a world where universities do that, check Europe in the 11th century. You might just like it
And if you want to see a world where colleges accept everyone, without requiring a minimum qualification, look at our current system: over 50% of students lack proficient literacy skills. It shouldn’t be controversial to recognize that some students are not capable of success in college.
Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
31–40 of 58 posts
Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#32I once listened to a scientific presentation that was interesting, but I don't remember the professor's name or whether his hypotheses have panned out long-term. That said, he flipped the script on the usual take on research trying to understand why some people respond to early adversity by going off the rails while others seem to trek through it relatively unaffected with positive outcomes. Usually the research focu…
Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#33Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#34Maybe colleges and scholarships that make admission decisions based on adversity can someday objectively measure it by DNA methylation. Also for reparations or welfare benefits. It would seem to be a more direct proxy than melanin pigment density. But on the other hand, adversity does not equal disadvantage, and in fact the trials that leave those marks -- beneath some threshold -- may bestow an advantage over unstre…
> Maybe colleges and scholarships that make admission decisions based on adversity can someday objectively measure it by DNA methylation. Also for reparations or welfare benefits. > A low methylation score could be interpreted as a call to mature a child's tissues more rapidly by the curated application of adversity. The paper didn't even find a unidirectional correlation between methylation and adversity. They say r…
Since when has science stopped someone who wanted to use DNA to assign someone a fixed role in society?
Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#35I once listened to a scientific presentation that was interesting, but I don't remember the professor's name or whether his hypotheses have panned out long-term. That said, he flipped the script on the usual take on research trying to understand why some people respond to early adversity by going off the rails while others seem to trek through it relatively unaffected with positive outcomes. Usually the research focu…
Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#36Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#37In a nutshell, is this basically "stress the part and it wears out faster"?
Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#38In a nutshell, is this basically "stress the part and it wears out faster"?
You might be interested in “hormesis”, a vital aspect of Life’s resilience, in which (some) stress improves a system.
Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe colleges can just accept the best students and do their job of educating them instead of arrogantly appointing themselves as saviors and righters of all wrongs in the world.
Higher education is the most potent tool for breaking the cycle of poverty. Your plan would lock people into the cycle of poverty for generations. Besides, how do you even define "best student". One that scores the highest on the SATs and has the highest high school grade? There's so much more to being a good learner than having the opportunity to get high grades and high test scores.
Re: Early adversity leaves lasting molecular imprint across the body: primate study
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe colleges can just accept the best students and do their job of educating them instead of arrogantly appointing themselves as saviors and righters of all wrongs in the world.
In the USA, at least, "every student college bound" has led to colleges being simply more high school but at an enormous cost of creating indentured servents. It will be very hard to to force colleges to downsize to the appropriate population count. Lots of prestige and money on the line