Not a thing about privacy. I assume they are streaming the world back to their servers. Where are the guarantees that nobody sees what you see? Nobody gets telemetry on what you are looking at, etc etc. I'm not prepared to have those things near me and will likely ask people wearing them to put them away without understanding the privacy implications. This should be a front page discussion instead of not mentioned.
Wdym? There's a "Privacy by design" section: > You’re in charge of what gets captured, and a glowing indicator light lets others know when you’re recording. We prioritize on-device processing, so you’re in control of permissions when third parties request camera or microphone access with internet connectivity. I still don't know if I'd trust them, but they at least address it.
Snap Smart Glasses
31–40 of 59 posts
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#32It’s telling that there are exactly zero photos of these glasses on a human face
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#33We need legislation that there’s a big bright red light when these things are recording. Do we really want to live in a world where people have hidden cameras strapped to their faces? Normal people don’t want this, it’s creepy
Not ideal, but also nothing different or new.
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#34We need legislation that there’s a big bright red light when these things are recording. Do we really want to live in a world where people have hidden cameras strapped to their faces? Normal people don’t want this, it’s creepy
It’s no more creepy than every person in the world holding a camera in their hand/pocket and every business and home in a city recording passers by 24/7. Not ideal, but also nothing different or new.
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#35Two things about smart glasses: 1. If I'm wearing smart glasses, whether I'm filming or using it for something else is nobody's business. I paid for it, I can do whatever I want with my computer glasses. 2. The fact that someone wearing them can snap my picture and unveil my entire history with one glance is terrifying. If they don't, the company can still do it "accidentally". 3. You can't have one without the other…
Unfortunately they won't.
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#36You mustn't be smart to buy 'smart glasses'..
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#37We need legislation that there’s a big bright red light when these things are recording. Do we really want to live in a world where people have hidden cameras strapped to their faces? Normal people don’t want this, it’s creepy
It’s no more creepy than every person in the world holding a camera in their hand/pocket and every business and home in a city recording passers by 24/7. Not ideal, but also nothing different or new.
Also, in the country where I live, it's illegal to record passers-by, so this is also way worse than that, but ymmv.
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#38Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
At this price, ain't two people going to make eye contact, ever.
First iPhone seemed useless and expensive.
People complained it didn't have apps and didn't support java, but it was very cool.
Also, it cost $500.
Re: Snap Smart Glasses
#40Never buy the first version of a new product, especially if it is an Apple product. Otherwise, who is using their Vision Pro right now? All I see is people giving them free feedback. So I would expect Snap to reduce the frames and the bulkiness of these glasses in the next version and finally, the price.
I used my M2 version of the Vision Pro every day last week, as did one of my colleagues and at least three of our clients.