Live data from Hacker News

Reviving Papers with Code

paperswithcode.co

31–40 of 48 posts

Re: Reviving Papers with Code

#31

I played a somewhat unusual role in this whole story. I was the guy who acquired in the original Papers with Code and managed them after they joined Facebook/Meta. It was super sad to see FB/M abandon the original mission of what PwC was building towards and let the original community resource rot. During the good times, we always talked about how PwC related to HF. So, I think there is a sort poetry to PwC winding u…

[flagged]

Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.

Re: Reviving Papers with Code

#32
post #9

Is there an RSS feed?

It does not seem they offer a web feed.

I asked for Atom/RSS about a year ago https://github.com/paperswithcode/paperswithcode-data/issues..., when the original paperswithcode feed disappeared.

It's a kind of coincidence that my own Atom feed of arXiv papers with code went live a few days ago https://code-available-feed.github.io/code-available-feed/.

It's independenent from Hugginface, and uses arXiv API directly. The code is open source, Apache 2. No AI is involved in parsing the arXiv pdfs, only a pattern match for known code-hosting domains like github.com or gitlab.com. This means there false positives, but that's probably fine, and their patterns could be tuned later.

You can host your own feed, by forking the repo and setting GitHub Actions environment variables. For now I'm hosting cs.AI and cs.SD categories.

Re: Reviving Papers with Code

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.

To be fair PwC is a very well established initialism. It would be like saying HTTP but actually referring to something other than the well understood meaning of that thing.

Re: Reviving Papers with Code

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.

To be fair PwC is a very well established initialism. It would be like saying HTTP but actually referring to something other than the well understood meaning of that thing.

The context of the PwC acronym is extremely unambigious in the comment.

Re: Reviving Papers with Code

#37
post #9

Is there an RSS feed?

Would you be interested in an RSS feed for: https://huggingface.co/papers/trending ?

https://huggingface.co/papers/ and https://paperswithcode.co/ are two different projects, right?

I don't get the idea of "trending" for scientific papers. I would like to see the full list of papers that have associated source code from the given research field, like the arXiv cs.SD category. The reason to see all papers is to get an overview of the field.

Re: Reviving Papers with Code

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.

To be fair PwC is a very well established initialism. It would be like saying HTTP but actually referring to something other than the well understood meaning of that thing.

what's the well established initialism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWC is it one of these?

Re: Reviving Papers with Code

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.

No, but I hate TLA overuse. Don't you? "Are you a bot" is an obvious slur when it's easy to see for yourself that I'm not.

It’s not overuse when first use in context is spelled out.
Post reply on HN