Live data from Hacker News

1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

troyhunt.com

31–40 of 133 posts

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#31
These days I treat other people's data like it's a live hand grenade. Case in point (bit of a shameless plug here :) I'm working on an App called Hockeytastic. It's an ice-hockey stickhandling app that my son's been using for months: the engine is solid but it looked like shit. However, his coach told me to get it on the app stores and sell subs. That meant I needed to clean it up, build a DB, store stuff etc.

Anyway, working with Google and Apple I realised that I quite literally do not need to store anything identifiable. The only identifier I store is the Apple id and the Google id and unless you steal those and then hack Google and Apple, they are utterly useless.

I do not store emails, names, addresses, nothing. That's the way I want it.

If the data is ever breached, the only thing hackers will see are many many instances of Connor McDavid, Nate Mckinnon and various other famous NHL player names :)

If more companies treated personal data like it was toxic, we'd have less issues with breaches, however, I see it in my day job where the marketing people want to take as much data as possible, all the time!

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#32
post #24
post #19

For years, I've been trying my best to stay low-key when it comes to my personal information on the internet. I don't create new accounts, I never cross-login with my email address, I don't use phones. Certainly not perfect, but a lot of times I'm preferring privacy over convenience. At the same time, my government and society at large is pushing more and more for "digital everything". It's great when it works. But t…

If a business legitimately needs such information to operate, isn't it borderline impossible to 100% prevent it from leaking? If the data is there, it can be compromised either by technical means or non-technical means. The primary issues in my opinion are (1) businesses collecting and holding on to information they don't need and (2) businesses getting so large that they become prime targets by default. In a world w…

I'd also add a third issue to this list: data retention. Too many companies I've dealt with have privacy policies that state something to the tune of "we'll hold onto your data for as long as required" without giving much of an explanation as to how long "as required" is.

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#33
post #24
post #19

For years, I've been trying my best to stay low-key when it comes to my personal information on the internet. I don't create new accounts, I never cross-login with my email address, I don't use phones. Certainly not perfect, but a lot of times I'm preferring privacy over convenience. At the same time, my government and society at large is pushing more and more for "digital everything". It's great when it works. But t…

If a business legitimately needs such information to operate, isn't it borderline impossible to 100% prevent it from leaking? If the data is there, it can be compromised either by technical means or non-technical means. The primary issues in my opinion are (1) businesses collecting and holding on to information they don't need and (2) businesses getting so large that they become prime targets by default. In a world w…

Small businesses are equally vulnerable, and it's possibly to perform cyber attacks at scale - Gen AI makes this easier

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#34
post #31

These days I treat other people's data like it's a live hand grenade. Case in point (bit of a shameless plug here :) I'm working on an App called Hockeytastic. It's an ice-hockey stickhandling app that my son's been using for months: the engine is solid but it looked like shit. However, his coach told me to get it on the app stores and sell subs. That meant I needed to clean it up, build a DB, store stuff etc. Anyway…

I wish that were the case, but because of there being barely any consequences for breaches, it's much more profitable to store everything you can and sell it to the highest bidder. Make it a huge risk to store data, then companies will start treating data like a live hand grenade.

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#35
post #29
post #19

For years, I've been trying my best to stay low-key when it comes to my personal information on the internet. I don't create new accounts, I never cross-login with my email address, I don't use phones. Certainly not perfect, but a lot of times I'm preferring privacy over convenience. At the same time, my government and society at large is pushing more and more for "digital everything". It's great when it works. But t…

> . I don't create new accounts, I never cross-login with my email address I honestly tend to think this is the only viable long term strategy. Let's face it: In a truly global internet where every single forum or website is hosted in a different country with a different jurisdiction, hoping that every single actor will act responsibly is just delusional. It is not what we see. It is not happening and it is not going…

Is the alternative just accepting that my data is out there? Even if I never used any online service, there are databases out there with my information anyway.

Just figure anything online that you aren't securing yourself is compromised. Minimize the effect that has on your life. Identify theft is annoying, but it rarely has severe effects.

You will have to go out of your way to be truly anonymous online, and it might be impossible if you aren't tech savvy enough. Otherwise, just assume everything you do online is public and act accordingly.

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#36
post #24
post #19

For years, I've been trying my best to stay low-key when it comes to my personal information on the internet. I don't create new accounts, I never cross-login with my email address, I don't use phones. Certainly not perfect, but a lot of times I'm preferring privacy over convenience. At the same time, my government and society at large is pushing more and more for "digital everything". It's great when it works. But t…

If a business legitimately needs such information to operate, isn't it borderline impossible to 100% prevent it from leaking? If the data is there, it can be compromised either by technical means or non-technical means. The primary issues in my opinion are (1) businesses collecting and holding on to information they don't need and (2) businesses getting so large that they become prime targets by default. In a world w…

There is a vast difference between it not being 100% impossible and data holders not doing the absolute basics to keep it safe.

I could imagine if, after a data breach, there was a government-run cyber investigative task force that would come into an organization, and be tasked with investigating and fully understanding the nature of the breach. We already have forensic detectives for other crimes, why not this one?

And if it turns out that the failure occurred due to the company acting negligently, a la (whoopsie all the records were in an open S3 bucket) then humans would be found personally liable.

--

But in principle, i also agree with the other causes you list. These are very much what GDPR was aimed at improving. It really is a shame when you look at what GDPR could have accomplished if not for malicious compliance by American tech giants, and shitty enforcement (instigated by American tech giants)

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#37
post #36
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a business legitimately needs such information to operate, isn't it borderline impossible to 100% prevent it from leaking? If the data is there, it can be compromised either by technical means or non-technical means. The primary issues in my opinion are (1) businesses collecting and holding on to information they don't need and (2) businesses getting so large that they become prime targets by default. In a world w…

There is a vast difference between it not being 100% impossible and data holders not doing the absolute basics to keep it safe. I could imagine if, after a data breach, there was a government-run cyber investigative task force that would come into an organization, and be tasked with investigating and fully understanding the nature of the breach. We already have forensic detectives for other crimes, why not this one?…

It doesn't even need to be government-run, we just need the right incentives. I've seen proposals for making some kind of data loss insurance mandatory to compensate victims. The insurance companies would then conduct audits which determine the premiums for the company, and investigate for negligence after a breach.

Edit: Thinking more about it, this would probably also be positive for security investigators. If a company is stonewalling you and ignoring a legitimate bug report, you now have the option to escalate this to the insurer. Maybe they could even facilitate bug bounty programs for smaller companies

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#38
post #31

These days I treat other people's data like it's a live hand grenade. Case in point (bit of a shameless plug here :) I'm working on an App called Hockeytastic. It's an ice-hockey stickhandling app that my son's been using for months: the engine is solid but it looked like shit. However, his coach told me to get it on the app stores and sell subs. That meant I needed to clean it up, build a DB, store stuff etc. Anyway…

Why does the app need to store the google/apple Id? Because it stores the data in the cloud, instead of locally for the app to use?

Re: 1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

#39
Not to spoil the surprise but it will get much MUCH worse. Reason: sloppers. Anyone who's dealt with security and has looked into how all the slop agents work can understand how catastrophic it is from a security perspective. The "yes" button on "I trust the authors" is what unlocks the gates of hell.
Post reply on HN