Replace "Them" with "Coworker" and the point of linking to the site is instantly understood (a LMGTFY-style shaming with a dash of humor to soften the blow) With "Them" I wasn't sure if you meant the AI companies, some dude I didn't recognize in the avatar, scammers, coworkers, etc...
Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
31–40 of 453 posts
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#32I swear most executives can barely read so you're not doing your career any favors sending them more than 150 characters.
Made it much easier to read and you could just reply with:
> bullet point
response
which made life much easier
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#33> Should we use Redis or Memcached? Couldn't they have used an example aimed at a broader audience? I'm in IT but even I barely know what Redis or Memcached is about (never used either).
90% of people here know what those are.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#34It's a matter of having good taste. But AI education will help.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#35This is slop too though, right? > Pasting a massive AI-generated response into a chat or email where a human would write one sentence. It destroys the medium itself. Nobody writes essays in Slack. It's only possible because of AI copy-paste. > It's like calling someone and asking "What time is the meeting?" and they read you a 10-page analysis of calendar management best practices. You asked a simple question. They l…
What makes you think this is AI slop?...
> It's a weapon disguised as helpfulness.
These are particular sentences I find questionable. Would you write that way? I certainly wouldn't.
GPTZero is by no means perfect, but it agreed this was likely generated.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#36Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#37Then at the end, "Use AI to make things clearer". NO! STOP USING AI AND JUST TALK!
Show some love for the layman, we are all laymen in areas we don't know about.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#38This is slop too though, right? > Pasting a massive AI-generated response into a chat or email where a human would write one sentence. It destroys the medium itself. Nobody writes essays in Slack. It's only possible because of AI copy-paste. > It's like calling someone and asking "What time is the meeting?" and they read you a 10-page analysis of calendar management best practices. You asked a simple question. They l…
I found the writing clear, concise, and human.
> It's a weapon disguised as helpfulness.
The source code is without a doubt AI (it's got a comment for the ""), so I guess one would have to assume they prepared the entire document beforehand, then fed it to Claude and instructed it to use that copy exactly.
...or they prompted "make me a site which tersely criticizes people who post AI slop on Slack, use the term slop grenade and style the site like nohello.net"
Eventually you just get a sense for these things.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#39Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#40> Nobody writes essays in Slack I 100% write long texts in Slack. I always try to provide as much context as possible when reaching out to someone with a question or request.
Introducing AI made markdown tags for conversations so others can only see what the wanty