31–40 of 51 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Who would have thought an auteur would be a fully formed and flawed person where flaws may be as extreme as their talent. It’s almost as if creativity is connected to emotions, ideology and experience or something.
My eyes are bleeding reading this CSS
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which genres would that be? One could also argue that certain genres simply won't ever work as an arthouse movie.
> Which genres would that be? Space opera, high fantasy and bangsian fantasy are three that come to mind.
Nothing like rules for spurring creativity. Waiting for the manual next.
I feel like it's pretty well known in creative spaces that constraints breed creativity.
Nothing like rules for spurring creativity. Waiting for the manual next.
[flagged]
>The film must be shot where the narrative takes place. This one really stands out by exculding whole genres and not really adding anything interesting to work around.
>The film must be shot where the narrative takes place. This one really stands out by exculding whole genres and not really adding anything interesting to work around.
I don't think it's meant as a constraint to be worked around, but as a guardrail against being inauthentic. And it excludes a lot less than its inspiration Dogme 95, which has as one rule "Genre movies are not acceptable."
I find that hilarious, like proclaiming that only other people have an ethnicity or an accent. Because of course Dogme is a genre of its own.