OpenAI and Government of Malta partner to roll out ChatGPT Plus to all citizens

Post by Muromec » Sat, May 16, 2026, 9:09 PM UTC

rtlambh wrote: post #18

A gambling, money laundering and Mafia paradise where journalists are killed for investigating the Mafia partners with OpenAI. A match made in heaven! Next, force an eyeball scan on the peasant population.

Post by raq98 » Sat, May 16, 2026, 9:11 PM UTC

arcanemachiner wrote: post #25

ninjahawk1 wrote: post #12

I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? If that’s the opinion, may be good to reflect on how the models were trained. On millions upon millions of books which no authors were compensated for. But that’s besides the point, the whole initiative is self-defeating by design.…

> I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? Your body also generates electricity and natural gas. Do you also get upset when energy companies claim to provide these services as a utility?

Post by hilariously » Sat, May 16, 2026, 9:11 PM UTC

malfist wrote: post #31

Muromec wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? We do and we don't. If you would go out there and talk to a random person about elliptic curves and matrix multiplications and whether you hit a performance ceiling in a specific 2x2 multiplication thingy with Karatsuba and wnaf,…

Is a dictionary intelligent?

Post by delusional » Sat, May 16, 2026, 9:12 PM UTC

ninjahawk1 wrote: post #12

I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? If that’s the opinion, may be good to reflect on how the models were trained. On millions upon millions of books which no authors were compensated for. But that’s besides the point, the whole initiative is self-defeating by design.…

Post by Muromec » Sat, May 16, 2026, 9:13 PM UTC

preisschild wrote: post #33

Muromec wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? We do and we don't. If you would go out there and talk to a random person about elliptic curves and matrix multiplications and whether you hit a performance ceiling in a specific 2x2 multiplication thingy with Karatsuba and wnaf,…

> We do and we don't. If you would go out there and talk to a random person about elliptic curves and matrix multiplications and whether you hit a performance ceiling in a specific 2x2 multiplication thingy with Karatsuba and wnaf, they would not know half the words, but the lying and flattering machine will be able to hold the conversation. Wikipedia has existed for decades...