this is exactly the ESPN logo as well
How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
31–40 of 63 posts
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#32> the devastating Kern Wars of 2067 Do we know who won those wars?
To be honest I've had a lot of difficulty telling the two sides apart
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#33> the devastating Kern Wars of 2067 Do we know who won those wars?
From the result there, looks like each faction got to keep some terrain.
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#34Missing The Terminator. Also applies to Wipeout, a game with some of my favorite logo and design work.
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#35Does the Back To The Future logo really count? Raiders of the Lost Ark as a very similar style but does not evoke "future". Yes, there are subtle differences. My point is, if you divorced them from the connection to their content I think it would be hard to point to one as "future" and the other as "not future"
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#36I dunno, it’s kinda futuristic, but it’s missing the faux 3d effect where it appears to have warped up close to you and left a trail of light behind it, like the Star Trek example of the end. Nothing says “future” like fake 3d effects.
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#37> the devastating Kern Wars of 2067 Do we know who won those wars?
Had the other side won, we would know them as the Kem Wars.
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#38And then there is the papyrus font for avatar…
I know what you did!
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#39And then there is the papyrus font for avatar…
They can't keep getting away with it!
For those who don't get it https://youtu.be/jVhlJNJopOQ
Re: How to make your text look futuristic (2016)
#40Does the Back To The Future logo really count? Raiders of the Lost Ark as a very similar style but does not evoke "future". Yes, there are subtle differences. My point is, if you divorced them from the connection to their content I think it would be hard to point to one as "future" and the other as "not future"
The future always has context.