That said, there is a signal about coding AI able to do a really good job at assisting to port c++ to plain and simple C en masse.
Dillo Browser Release 3.3.0
31–38 of 38 posts
Re: Dillo Browser Release 3.3.0
#32It's so lightweight!
Re: Dillo Browser Release 3.3.0
#33Sad dillo is c++, I would have compiled it with a small and alternative plain and simple C compiler like cproc/qbe or tinycc. That said, there is a signal about coding AI able to do a really good job at assisting to port c++ to plain and simple C en masse.
Re: Dillo Browser Release 3.3.0
#34Am I the only one who has to giggle when reading that name? I know people have somewhat related thoughts about the image editor called GIMP.
Yeah, I was going to say the same thing, kind of an unfortunate name. Why? It makes you think of a DILD*. Then you have to remind yourself, they probably mean armadillo.
Re: Dillo Browser Release 3.3.0
#35Unfortunately even Google started requiring JS, which was a huge attack against small browsers and the open web.
Re: Dillo Browser Release 3.3.0
#36Re: Dillo Browser Release 3.3.0
#37Sad dillo is c++, I would have compiled it with a small and alternative plain and simple C compiler like cproc/qbe or tinycc. That said, there is a signal about coding AI able to do a really good job at assisting to port c++ to plain and simple C en masse.
I did attempt this with whatever was state of the art (SOTA) about 6 months ago for my own C++ and was disappointed. It's just not there yet.
So that signal is that good. Back to manual c++ to simple and plain C porting then.