Live data from Hacker News

Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

ai.meta.com

31–40 of 392 posts

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#31
post #6

The second paragraph starts "Muse Spark is the first step on our scaling ladder and the first product of a ground-up overhaul of our AI efforts. To support further scaling, we are making strategic investments..." This article is about Meta, not about the user. Who signs off on these? Is the intended audience other people at Meta, not the user?

Stock up 9% today, very pleasant for Zuck if you do the math on his net worth :)

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#32

Question: since they've rebooted their approach to AI... have they given up on open models? There's no mention of open source or open weights or access to the models beyond their hosted services.

Alexandr Wang on Twitter [0] mentioned open source plans:

"this is step one. bigger models are already in development with infrastructure scaling to match. private api preview open to select partners today, with plans to open-source future versions. incredibly proud of the MSL team. excited for what’s to come!"

https://x.com/alexandr_wang/status/2041909388852748717

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#34
post #22

This would have been an amazing release 6 months ago. But the industry moves so fast, this is a trite release. Maybe it’s best for Meta to sell their superintelligence division. I don’t think Zuck’s vision is particularly compelling.

I never understood why meta decided to join the race. They don’t sell compute like Google or Microsoft. Why not let others do the hard work and integrate their LLMs in your systems if needed? I assume it’s because they have Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, Thread data and feel they should be the ones using them for training, but it’s really not obvious how having a frontier AI lab benefits their business

Because Zuck has chronic FOMO, he's said as much himself

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#35
How is that Meta spent so much money for talent and hardware, but the model barely matches Opus 4.6?

Especially, looking at these numbers after Claude Mythos, feels like either Anthropic has some secret sauce, or everyone else is dumber compared to the talent Anthropic has

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#36

This would have been an amazing release 6 months ago. But the industry moves so fast, this is a trite release. Maybe it’s best for Meta to sell their superintelligence division. I don’t think Zuck’s vision is particularly compelling.

> I don’t think Zuck’s vision is particularly compelling.

But he has to do it anyways, otherwise Meta can be disrupted easily.

Google, Apple has hardware, distribution channels for their products

Amazon has the marketplace and cloud

Microsoft has enterprise and cloud

Meta is always looking for ways to stay afloat

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#37
post #22

This would have been an amazing release 6 months ago. But the industry moves so fast, this is a trite release. Maybe it’s best for Meta to sell their superintelligence division. I don’t think Zuck’s vision is particularly compelling.

I never understood why meta decided to join the race. They don’t sell compute like Google or Microsoft. Why not let others do the hard work and integrate their LLMs in your systems if needed? I assume it’s because they have Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, Thread data and feel they should be the ones using them for training, but it’s really not obvious how having a frontier AI lab benefits their business

But then how will Zuck win the billionaire dick measuring contest?

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#38
post #6

The second paragraph starts "Muse Spark is the first step on our scaling ladder and the first product of a ground-up overhaul of our AI efforts. To support further scaling, we are making strategic investments..." This article is about Meta, not about the user. Who signs off on these? Is the intended audience other people at Meta, not the user?

The article is published primarily to signal to the market that Meta is serious in its efforts to compete in building frontier ai models. They want to 1) attract talent, 2) tell wall street they can play in this space as well, 3) help employees feel the company is moving in the right direction. A frontier LLM doesn't apply to their core consumer products.

the blog is the product. investor deck posted as a tech launch

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#39
Until you actually try the model itself, assume any benchmark presented to you as being part of the marketing material of the model, as it is not independently verified and completely biased.

The same is true with any other model, unless otherwise stated.

In the next few days, we'll see who Meta has paid to promote this model on social media.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#40

How is that Meta spent so much money for talent and hardware, but the model barely matches Opus 4.6? Especially, looking at these numbers after Claude Mythos, feels like either Anthropic has some secret sauce, or everyone else is dumber compared to the talent Anthropic has

[dead]
Post reply on HN