Live data from Hacker News

I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 54 posts

Re: I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

#31
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would be careful with calling that kind of design function over style. Why?

For one, it is awful on mobile. We can have bare, simple sites while still making them accessible.

Why is it awful? Most barebones websites are naturally responsive..

Re: I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For one, it is awful on mobile. We can have bare, simple sites while still making them accessible.

Why is it awful? Most barebones websites are naturally responsive..

I don't usually see this because it seems to require intentional design to work on mobile. The original post has an example that doesn't lay out well on mobile, or just a very tall and thin desktop window.

Re: I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

#35

Hacker News itself is a good example — no JavaScript bloat, loads instantly, works on anything. I also appreciate sites where you can actually find what you came for without dismissing three popups and a newsletter signup first. As someone who came late to the internet and learned a lot from straightforward, no-frills documentation sites, I have a soft spot for anything that just gets out of the way. With that being…

Ever since my phone's wifi broke and I'm on 1 bar LTE at home, I've been using HN more. The site even looks good and modern imo.

Re: I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For one, it is awful on mobile. We can have bare, simple sites while still making them accessible.

Why is it awful? Most barebones websites are naturally responsive..

Talking about the url provided in the OP, one click on Firefox for mobile and it should be obvious. Text wider than then the screen, yellow text on white background. line spacing that's too tight, a background image that obscures text...

Re: I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

#38
I like simple no-frills function-first websites, but I don't consider it a good thing when an old-style website has text running across the entire width of my 1440p monitor. It's just not pleasant to read, and given that the fix is often just two CSS rules (max-width:800px;margin:auto), I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for. You can still design your website like we're in the era of 800x600 displays, but please, take the tiny step to make it play nice with larger screens too.

Re: I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

#39
post #8

I would be careful with calling that kind of design function over style. Modern UI design has its merits. But yes, good designs are not flashy, e.g. I love the design of Astro Starlight ( https://starlight.astro.build/ ), a starter kit for documentation pages. So I also took inspiration from "simple designs" for my personal site: https://bryanhogan.com/

> I would be careful with calling that kind of design function over style. Why?

I, for one, found reading the text under the News section quite difficult to read. The combination of the font color and the spacing/kerning made it all appear like a character soup to me. It's possible this is something that has variable impact across populations though.

Generally speaking though, I do think trying to paint 90s websites as some sort of utopian ideal of function and design is purely an exercise in nostalgia and nothing else. It is entirely possible to make fast, responsive, accessible, well-designed rich websites today, all without writing a word of JavaScript (not that including JS by itself is bad or anything). Do not mistake anti-user functions like heavy weight analytics and user tracking libraries, or poorly optimized and ill-architected code bundles as the current "state of the art".

Re: I prefer OG style websites – what are yours?

#40

This one has a special place in my heart https://www.tibia.com/news/

The Cloudflare gate and large cookie warning with a multi-step opt-out kind of killed it for me before I could even give it a chance. It’s just an off putting welcome for a new user.

yeah it's sad here's a webarchive version https://web.archive.org/web/20040701163325/http://www.tibia....
Post reply on HN