Just curious if “number of panels” is a genuine metric by which financial terminals are judged?
The only real metric by which financial terminals are judged is "Why don't we have any bloombergs? The bond traders are throwing a hissy fit."
I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
31–40 of 47 posts
Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#32Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#33Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is great work! Where are you getting your data from? Finding quality data sources is difficult
As far as I know, finding quality data sources is virtually impossible unless you already have so much money that your involvement in the stock market is either because you have insider knowledge or severe boredom owing to your never needing to work a day in your life. I remember some startup selling a stock market data API as a subscription. I don’t think they exist anymore. So anyone who spent weeks, months of thei…
Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
The real moat of the Bloomberg terminals is the messaging feature that connects you to the other traders.
Fascinating. It’s called Instant Bloomberg and it’s just AOL instant messenger but only between Bloomberg Terminals. So that is absolutely the “data that insiders rely on that pedestrians will never have” and I’m sure it offers tremendous advantage and may explain why stocks trend in a direction for extended periods of time absent any public news. I mean there’s no way average joes like us stand a chance doing anythi…
It's more risky than index funds, but being able to ride a bit of the Nvidia hype and then de-risking those proceeds into an index fund is nice.
You'll probably never win with day-trading or HFT though.
(not financial advice!)
Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean? It says used AI in the title. That already implies it doesn't actually work.
Strong disagree on AI implying it doesn’t actually work. Staff engineers at FAANG are vibe coding these days and their stuff absolutely works.
It's so easy to pump out borderline useless functionality with AI that nobody is actually testing or designing it.
Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#37I built Neuberg because I’d always wanted a Bloomberg Terminal, but as an independent trader, I just couldn’t justify paying $24,000 a year for it. So I decided to build my own with Claude Code. It’s a real-time trading terminal covering fixed income, derivatives, commodities, equities, credit, macro, and alternative assets, with 516 panels in total. You can freely drag, drop, and arrange them however you like. What…
Most of the value of the Bloomberg terminal is the data, not the number of panels
Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#38Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#39I built Neuberg because I’d always wanted a Bloomberg Terminal, but as an independent trader, I just couldn’t justify paying $24,000 a year for it. So I decided to build my own with Claude Code. It’s a real-time trading terminal covering fixed income, derivatives, commodities, equities, credit, macro, and alternative assets, with 516 panels in total. You can freely drag, drop, and arrange them however you like. What…
I’m curious about the UI development. What sort of prompts did you give? Ie look like this or look like that? Or did you specify the qualities?
Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of the value of the Bloomberg terminal is the data, not the number of panels
as someone who worked at TR (now Refinitiv) and then Bloomberg, it's not even the data. it's IB. After IB it's the data. :)