Live data from Hacker News

Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

arstechnica.com

31–40 of 40 posts

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#31
post #30
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm, I'm kind of amazed that kitte.nz isn't taken :)

Unfortunately .nz has the structured second level domains, so you'd end up with kitte.co.nz.

First thing that popped in to my mind: decepti.co.nz

My mind wasn't the first it popped in to though.

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#32
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately .nz has the structured second level domains, so you'd end up with kitte.co.nz.

First thing that popped in to my mind: decepti.co.nz My mind wasn't the first it popped in to though.

That would be horrible to try to build a business on if you weren't the rightsholder, though.

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#35

This reminds me of the need for robust P2P tech in the name resolution layer.

namecoins fit the bill rather nicely, its essentially bitcoin, but applied to DNS. http://www.dot-bit.org/

Do they? No one seems to be using them despite the fact that centralized DNS seems to be fatally flawed. Maybe it just really isn't that big of a problem when put in context.

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

namecoins fit the bill rather nicely, its essentially bitcoin, but applied to DNS. http://www.dot-bit.org/

Do they? No one seems to be using them despite the fact that centralized DNS seems to be fatally flawed. Maybe it just really isn't that big of a problem when put in context.

The 'people with money' could make it happen if they wanted to, but since they have money, they're not too concerned about the government taking things away.

The little guy has more to lose than the big guys, but few people are going to jump through hoops for the little guy.

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#37

I realize that Gabon isn't the US, but having something taken away before any crime is even committed. That seems a bit extreme. What's next, pre-crime units?

My understanding is that his domain registration was invalidated or revoked because he made a public statement that he would use this domain to circumvent anti-piracy laws. I'm sure it's in the Registrar's TOS that using domains for criminal enterprises is not allowed.

Seems like a less extreme course of action would be to just send him a warning that, should he do so, his domain would be revoked (possibly without notice).

Though, as someone pointed out, if you follow the purse strings you hit Vivendi which is deeply invested in copyright. Seems likely that someone realized that they had access to kill his .ga domain, sent out the relevant requests, and extreme (rather than measured) action was taken.

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#38
post #5

I still don't understand why insane people use ccTLDs for the characters, rather than due to the national law. It's like picking a flag of convenience for your ship due to the pretty colors of the flag.

branding

I can't be the only one that finds a "clever" domain name to feel less serious and trustworthy.

I might not be in a demographic that matters, but I do wonder about the numbers.

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#39
post #2

The .ga registrar is managed by a subsidiary of Vivendi, so this isn't too surprising.

For those that don't know, Vivendi is a French conglomerate that has strong holdings in music, movies, TV, and video games. Their assets include Universal Music Group and a 61% stake in Activision Blizzard.

For context: Universal Music Group was the driving force behind the MegaUpload raid, they really don't like Kimble.

Re: Kim Dotcom loses new domain in preemptive strike by Gabon government

#40
post #6

I realize that Gabon isn't the US, but having something taken away before any crime is even committed. That seems a bit extreme. What's next, pre-crime units?

The Department of FCFL (Future Crimes, Future Laws) has determined that this comment will breach future legislation. Please report to your closest incarceration facility immediately.

Not to be confused with FLCL (Gainax going insane).
Post reply on HN