31–40 of 43 posts
have you guys checked nQUIC? Would be interesting to see Noise integrated in Noq as well :)
The cool thing about noq (and Quinn, where we inherited this from), is that you can implement your own "Session" trait. So that can be either TLS or nQUIC.
Which got it's name from 'Not Coq'
iroh seems like a very well positioned product in the era of people rapidly building applications for personal use. I'm really interested in seeing how they continue to grow. I personally have been looking off and on at providing an "app relay" using it, where people can get an OSS, self-hostable (if desired), zero config way to remotely access their app/data on their network. This would be separate than a "network r…
You may be interested in my list here: https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling In particular I believe OpenZiti has a similar focus on embedding the tunnel in the apps.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You may be interested in my list here: https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling In particular I believe OpenZiti has a similar focus on embedding the tunnel in the apps.
This is exactly the type of thing I was thinking of. Thanks
I was just reading the QUIC multipath RFC. Didn't it come out literally yesterday? I guess it's common to have the implementation foreshadowing the RFC but it's jarring to see them back to back like this.
"Rough consensus and running code" is the IETF's unofficial motto. Working Group Drafts are generally accompanied by implementations.
https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/issues/224#issuecomment-38... It's lovely to see the polite and respectful back and forth in this comment thread where the Iroh folks are talking about deciding to fork. :)
The iroh team keeps cooking, unreal. I’m excited to have a weekend to just sit down and tinker with iroh, it’s been on my list for a while. I want to make an overlay network like nebula with it