Live data from Hacker News

I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

dwarkesh.com

31–40 of 237 posts

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI slop > The uncomfortable truth is that... > ...that the real question isn't... > Corporate resistance...introduces friction at the infrastructure layer And check comment history ( https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=julius_eth_dev ) Sometime yesterday, or further back, someone has decided to run a bot experiment ( https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=patchnull , https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079…

I mean almost certainly but what do the sentences you’ve highlighted have to do with that.

They're AI tells. No human would write about how "corporate friction" "introduces friction at the infrastructure layer", except maybe someone who's trying to use big words to sound smart, because it barely makes sense (what "friction"? "Infrastructure layer", what are the other layers?)

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#32
But this isn’t a fight about Anthropic, or mass surveillance, or even AI. This is a fight about lawfare, constitutional rights, and corruption.

The lawfare part of it is that to coerce an individual or a company, governments are willing to abuse their power. The Biden administration did it when pressuring social media companies to censor content. The Trump administration is doing it to a much greater extent with things like ordering every government agency to stop using Anthropic and by labeling them a supply chain risk.

The ideological part of it is when Defense Sec Hegseth and Trump and AI Czar / PayPal Mafia member David Sacks repeatedly attack Anthropic as “woke”, and it is clear they’re undermining this company from their government positions based on Anthropic’s speech (first amendment violation). This obviously is part of why they attacked Anthropic in such a public way.

And the corruption part of it is OpenAI’s leaders being big supporters of the MAGA movement and the Trump administration. Greg Brockman, president of OpenAI, is the biggest donor ever to the MAGA PAC. Why did Hegseth grant a contract to OpenAI after banning Anthropic, even though OpenAI has the same red lines in their agreement (what Sam Altman claimed)? It’s because of the corruption - give Trump and his family/friends money, and you’ll get something back.

The fight against these types of government abuse have ALWAYS been happening. But the abuse is much more in the open today, and much larger in scale than ever before. Scandals like Watergate would not even make the news today. And that is what the public should be waking up to and focusing on. We need to rethink our political system significantly and add a lot more protections against the kind of things the Trump 2.0 administration has done.

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#33
post #18

But the "Anthropic fight" is mostly fake. Palantir was using Claude as base model. Anthropic allegedly took issue with unsupervised kills because the technology wasn't ready (or something along the lines). Also, I remember reading this guy has close ties to Anthropic. Also, I find it suspicious how he came to prominence out of nowhere. Like Big Tech and the establishment are propping podcasts of controlled narrative/…

He's roommates with an Anthropic researcher, I was roommates with a Google product manager I don't think I'm really bought out by Google.

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#34
post #3

[flagged]

Dwarkesh is your run-of-the-mill vapid influencer idiot. Fridman on the other hand, when in the presence of greatness, knows to STFU and listen.

There's definitely something to be said for giving interesting people a platform to express their views unconditionally. Unfortunately, that can also be a very dangerous thing. I have been less and less impressed over the years with Lex's approach here.

I'm personally very glad that Dwarkesh isn't like that. He's not perfect, but I think he's doing a way better job than other podcasters in the field right now.

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#35
One thing I’ve never heard a good answer to: If Anthropic is a supplier not to the Department of Defense itself, but to Palantir, why isn’t supply chain risk the proper designation (assuming the government’s concerns with Anthropic having authority over military missions is valid)?

As for whether code written with Claude Code should be so considered - if it’s just code that is subject to human review, I would argue that this use shouldn’t be a supply chain risk. But with Claude Code PR Review and similar products, the chance that an AI product (not limiting to Anthropic here) could own a load-bearing part of the lifecycle of a critical piece of code becomes much larger, and deserves scrutiny.

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#36
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Link please!

Elon Musk – "In 36 months, the cheapest place to put AI will be space”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYXbuik3dgA

Thanks for the link because I can't stomach 3 hours of this.

First phrase: "you're saving on energy by putting data centers in space". What?

2:08 "It's harder to scale on the ground than it is in space" what?

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#37

[flagged]

AI slop > The uncomfortable truth is that... > ...that the real question isn't... > Corporate resistance...introduces friction at the infrastructure layer And check comment history ( https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=julius_eth_dev ) Sometime yesterday, or further back, someone has decided to run a bot experiment ( https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=patchnull , https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079…

I think we can flag those comments now that the new guidelines are published: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079

Re: I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean almost certainly but what do the sentences you’ve highlighted have to do with that.

They're AI tells. No human would write about how "corporate friction" "introduces friction at the infrastructure layer", except maybe someone who's trying to use big words to sound smart, because it barely makes sense (what "friction"? "Infrastructure layer", what are the other layers?)

AI didn't invent the terms, they were a part of the training data given to it.

The real tell is that you've not been in the group of people that use these terms frequently enough for you to think they're normal.

It's like the emdash alarmism, AI never invented emdash, nor did it invent using it frequently. Its training was full of examples, so many that AI picked up using it frequently.

Post reply on HN