Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not asking for confidence. Folks can use their own critical thinking and judgement. I expressed sincerity. Some concur, some don't. I'm not trying and will not try to please everyone. The current state of software is to some, myself, deeply offensive and many have passionate opposition to it. If you are into stockware, you won't ever find me in your way. But you'll not bully me into not expressing my opinion eith…
What dark patterns is the Pixel Camera app using, or what bad things is it doing with my data? In what way is my camera app infringing on my freedom? "It was written by company X I don't like" is not an answer - why should I replace my camera app specifically?
Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
31–40 of 116 posts
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#32Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#33I downloaded that on my spare Android phone (I'm primarily an iOS 17 user), but never ended up using it because it just wasn't aesthetically pleasant. I also don't really take photos using my Android phone, I guess. Randomly, I wish more UI/UX designers contribute to open source.
This. I've had so many projects where I wish someone who really cared about UX could just tell me "this sucks, if you want I can help"
Just look at the monstruosity that is the GUI version of wget, it's the epitome of programmers with no UX background trying to make a GUI application.
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it really as good as Google Camera at computational photography; noise reduction, night mode, deblurring, stacking, etc.? That would be very impressive.
Depends on specific purpose and values. And it's a simple installation away from empirical validation. Edit: one feature I'm fond of, when posting images on the Internet, is disabling exif data. I don't always want to put my coordinates on the Internet.
My experience was that while it was great with all the features, the photo quality simply was worse than the stock manufacturer app in newer phones. Only in my old Samsung Galaxy S5 was the quality on par.
Yes, by all means, everyone should try and compare.
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#35Which camera brands / models don't phone home or have "smart" ai features built in provided over a proprietary cloud app?
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#36Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#37Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
This. I've had so many projects where I wish someone who really cared about UX could just tell me "this sucks, if you want I can help"
Many programmers think they can cheat their way into designing a good UI, they just think it's just enough for you to learn and use a GUI framework, and place the widgets in a "good enough" way. Just look at the monstruosity that is the GUI version of wget, it's the epitome of programmers with no UX background trying to make a GUI application.
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#39GrapheneOS secure camera is great. https://github.com/GrapheneOS/Camera
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
What dark patterns is the Pixel Camera app using, or what bad things is it doing with my data? In what way is my camera app infringing on my freedom? "It was written by company X I don't like" is not an answer - why should I replace my camera app specifically?
One negative of the Pixel camera app is that it forces Google Photos as the gallery app, even if Google Photos is disabled or not installed on the phone. I think there is a third-party shim app that essentially redirects requests to Google Photos towards whatever gallery app is set as default, but that should not be necessary.