> Half their agentic usage is coding. When that's your reality, you train for it. You optimize the tool use, the file editing, the multi-step workflows - because that's what your paying users are actually doing. Google doesn't have that same pressure. I wonder if this is a strategic choice — anthropic has decided to go after the developers, a motivated but limited market. Whereas the general populace might be more at…
Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
31–40 of 85 posts
Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#32Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#33I've been using ChatGPT (Thinking). I like how it has learned how I do stuff, and keeps that in mind. Yesterday, I asked it to design an API, and it referenced a file I had sent in, for a different server, days earlier, in order to figure out what to do. I'm not using it in the same way that many folks do. Maybe if I get to that point, I'll prefer Claude, but for my workflow, ChatGPT has been ideal. I guess the best…
Oof. I turned the history referencing off. I use ChatGPT for wildly diverging topics and it will bring things up that have zero relevance to what I'm currently looking for if history is on.
I will see whether or not I can “wipe the slate clean,” between projects.
I would also NEVER use it for any confidential/proprietary stuff that can’t leak.
The project I’m working on is not open-source, but we don’t really care too much, if it leaks. I don’t send in any credentials; just source.
Right now, it’s helping me design tests in Postman, to validate the API.
Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#34Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#35Dev, very happy with Gemini, especially flash Googles AI products suck hard though
Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#36Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#37Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#381) I don't want to give OpenAI my money. I don't like how they are spending so much money to shape politics to benefit them. That seems to fly in the face of this being a public benefit. If you have to spend money like that because you're afraid of what the public will do, what does that say?
2) I like how Claude just gives me straight text on one side, examples on the other, and nothing else. ChatGPT and Gemini tend to go overboard with tables, lists, emojis, etc. I can't stand it.
3) A lot of technical online conversation seems to have been hollowed out in recent years. The amount of people making blog posts explaining how to use something new has basically tanked.
Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#39I dont trust openai, or google. google has beyond proven that they aren't trustworthy well before the LLM coding tool era. I am legitimately not even giving them a chance.
Sadly I am assuming anthropic will at some point lose my trust, but for now they just feel like the obvious choice for me.
So obviously i am a terrible overall observer, but i am sure i am not alone in the auto win portion of devs choosing anthropic.
Re: Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI
#40> Half their agentic usage is coding. When that's your reality, you train for it. You optimize the tool use, the file editing, the multi-step workflows - because that's what your paying users are actually doing. Google doesn't have that same pressure. I wonder if this is a strategic choice — anthropic has decided to go after the developers, a motivated but limited market. Whereas the general populace might be more at…
I doubt it. Gemini is heavily used internally for coding with integrations across Google's developer tooling. gemini-cli is not meaningfully different from claude code.