Live data from Hacker News

EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

theguardian.com

31–40 of 56 posts

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#31
post #27

Its so bad that these day such posts are flagged in HN and you cannot have any discussion about it. Feels like censorship and HN not doing anything about it to be at least transparent about providing some stats how many times something got flagged and how flagging algorithm works so we at least have some confidence that it's not abused by bots

we probably need a european HN equivalent

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#32
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sadly we, the "good guys", created a dangerous precedent in the balkans when Kosovo unilaterally split from Serbia, under foreign (NATO) occupation moreover. International law does not promote nor support unilateral secessions. If a region or autonomous republic wants to secede it should only do so in accordance to the host country laws. E.g. the Quebec and Scotland referendums were made in accordance to the host cou…

It's hardly a precedent, probably half of the countries worldwide have been formed by seceding from some other country against its will. U.S. would be in this half.

It's the first country to do so under foreign military presence since UN inception.

The only precedents of unilateral secession were Slovenia and Croatia from Yugoslavia and Bangladesh from Pakistan but none did so under foreign military presence.

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#33
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's hardly a precedent, probably half of the countries worldwide have been formed by seceding from some other country against its will. U.S. would be in this half.

It's the first country to do so under foreign military presence since UN inception. The only precedents of unilateral secession were Slovenia and Croatia from Yugoslavia and Bangladesh from Pakistan but none did so under foreign military presence.

[flagged]

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#34
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Countries can be sold?

Not in a meaningful way which Greenlanders would submit to. There would be constant unrest and civil disobedience, nothing would function, and bringing in your own people (including the armed forces) to keep things barely working wouldn't be a solution either.

Unfortunately Greenland as a whole has 50.000 people in total of which 20.000 live in largest city and the rest scattered across 19 others. Thats about the size of a small town in the US, the country may be big in territory but not in population.

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#35
post #16
post #6

Escalate to deescalate. Trump doesn’t understand that Greenland is a ~country~ self-gorverning territory in itself in the Kingdom of Denmark. Just like Australia is country in itself in the Commonwealth. England would never be able to sell Australia to the US, just as we in Denmark are not able to sell Greenland. The only way forward is trade war it seems and it would be better to escalate it quickly in order for Tru…

Greenland is not a country, it is a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.

Puerto Rico is not a country, today, but is analogous to Greenland. They could vote to become closer to the US or vote to distance themselves. Similar to all less-than-independent regions held by larger countries. Remnants of the age of exploration or before, or the crumbs left from wars.

Pushing the me-strong logic to the (absurd?) limit, why isn’t California a country? Or New England? Or the red state swath of the US?

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the first country to do so under foreign military presence since UN inception. The only precedents of unilateral secession were Slovenia and Croatia from Yugoslavia and Bangladesh from Pakistan but none did so under foreign military presence.

[flagged]

Avoid witch hunting, it adds nothing to discussions and it's against the rules of this board.

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#37
I believe what Bessent is leaving aside, probably not out of ignorance but for rhetoric sake, is that Denmark isn't alone, alone it would be a small player (while still being disproportionately bigger for its relative size and population) but the Nordics tend to band together, the Nordic Council is one of the oldest and closest alliances in the modern age.

With the Nordic Council it becomes 22 million people with a GDP of US$ 2.2 trillion, the same GDP as Canada, close to Italy, Russia, and Brazil.

You piss off Denmark and the rest of the Nordic Council members will support it.

On top of all of that you then have the European Union, in which the majority of members will also put support behind one of its members (notwithstanding the likes of Hungary, and perhaps Slovakia with its latest government).

It's really sad to watch this rhetoric unfold from the USA, it starts with the heads but now we see it creeping into comments here on HN. It's bizarre how easily American public opinion is manipulated.

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#38
post #27

Its so bad that these day such posts are flagged in HN and you cannot have any discussion about it. Feels like censorship and HN not doing anything about it to be at least transparent about providing some stats how many times something got flagged and how flagging algorithm works so we at least have some confidence that it's not abused by bots

we probably need a european HN equivalent

Hackeur News

Re: EU chief says EU should abandon caution after Bessent calls Denmark 'irrelevant'

#39
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand. Are you implying that Greenland can decide to sell itself then?

Greenlanders could vote to be completely independent, yes. That is the situation right now. However, Trump has done everything to turn Greenlanders away, and not done anything to convince them of independence would be good for them, so a vote for independence will likely fail catastrophically right now. Independence is many decades away, as they would really have to build a stronger economy to make it happen, but tha…

The "independence" of Greenland under Trump would be identical to the "independence" of Venezuela following the US' abduction of its leader & murder of 100 people during the operation. Whatever Greenland's opinion on independence is, what's on offer by Trump would only be worse in every way than what they currently have.
Post reply on HN