Live data from Hacker News

Datadog, thank you for blocking us

deductive.ai

31–35 of 35 posts

Re: Datadog, thank you for blocking us

#31
post #10

Logging, tracing, observability, and control plane (flags, etc.) should be open. We built 100% in-house pieces for all of this at a major fintech a decade ago. Everything worked and single teams could manage these systems. Someone in leadership said we had to get rid of all "weirdware". Open solutions weren't robust, so we went commerical. SignalFX got acquired, immediately 10x'd our prices and put all hands on deck…

NIH syndrome isn't sustainable, unless you're like Google and have more money than sense. > These systems need to be open and owned by us. Managed is okay, but they shouldn't be proprietary offerings. You could say this about all software in the world, but good luck with that... people who make money off of making things and selling things are going to keep doing so in non-open ways, because it's advantageous. And cu…

> NIH syndrome isn't sustainable, unless you're like Google and have more money than sense.

Control plane and observability are key concerns of a fintech handling billions in daily transaction volume.

We had teams building and managing our solutions. After the migrations, we had teams managing the integrations. The headcount didn't change, we just wound up paying external vendors and sequencing multiple provider moves and company wide migrations. The changes caused several outages and shifted OKRs.

Re: Datadog, thank you for blocking us

#33
post #2

Edit: a couple of comments pointed out that the blog does mention paying Datadog. Leaving my comment as is below, because I still find the whole interaction weird. It makes me wonder if the story is fabricated. > we lost visibility into production systems that depend fundamentally on continuous observability signals to operate safely. The Datadog message implies that Deductive wasn't paying for any service from Datad…

> otherwise they would have paid for the service they were "depending fundamentally" on. It's a "*.ai" company. Deductive probably spent more human time on their fancy animated landing page than engineering their actual system. If they vibe coded most of their product, I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't even know they were using Datadog until they got the email.

Yeah I think this explanation makes most sense. The story doesn’t add up, it’s just deceptive marketing.

Re: Datadog, thank you for blocking us

#34

This was clearly written by a bot heavily trained on linkedin posts, or someone horrifically addicted to linkedin. Its nauseating to read.

- Clickbait title

- AI mentioned in the subtitle

- AI generated image

Straight to /dev/null with this slop.

Post reply on HN