Live data from Hacker News

A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

joseph-smith.co.uk

31–40 of 115 posts

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#31
post #12

I see such behavior from time to time but feels off-taste IMHO. It's almost as if would be more professional if they worked with the Italian mafia to coerce for payment(not that I approve such thing). If contract broken, sue them. Why throwing a scene?

because social shaming is faster and cheaper than the legal system

and doesn’t involve physical violence like the mafia

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#33
post #13

[flagged]

“Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.”https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Believe it or not, it’s prime daylight hours across most of the US sitting at their desks browsing HN.

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#34
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you get their email to go down exactly?

Disable the account or change DNS records are the easiest.

This is illegal in most places unless the contract says otherwise. You don't have a lien on a website or domain the way you do for a car.

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#35
post #33
post #13

[flagged]

“Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.” — https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Believe it or not, it’s prime daylight hours across most of the US sitting at their desks browsing HN.

I refuse to believe that people can do downvotes on a long-ish comment 4 seconds after something is posted.

Not even read. Posted. That means they had to refresh exactly at that moment, within a second of it being posted, scroll down the page to that comment, read it, and downvote it, in 4 seconds! Come on

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#36
post #13

[flagged]

I've had trouble explaining to clients the what a "domain name" is and how it is different from the "website host". I can only begin to imagine having to also explain cryptocurrency and a convoluted system like this.

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#37
post #13

[flagged]

> 4 seconds after I posted it, it got downvoted. Then 10 seconds later, -2. Because it has the word cryptocurrency. No one can load, read and react that fast. This is getting ridiculous. Turn off the bots based on a word, and engage with the substance.

Because as soon as you said Cryptocurrency, you lost the plot.

Everything you said is literally how freelancing already works. You pay a certain amount upfront, and then pay more based on deliverables.

> Cryptocurrency is the right fit here because you want it to be tied to something the client can’t just mint unlimited amounts of

Can you tell me how to mint unlimited amounts of US Dollars? I would love this hack.

> just another use of cryptocurrency that properly aligns everyone’s incentives and prevents legal disputes through continuity instead of abruptness

How does a blockchain determine whether I built the site the owner wanted?

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#38
post #13

[flagged]

I don't downvote things I disagree with though (only bad faith and anti-hn-rules behavior) and I didn't downvote this.

The substance seems very silly to me. Even if businesses were well versed in using crypto and it didn't have such a scam reputation it's still silly to me. Using a cryptocurrency blockchain for any of this, let alone all of this, lands squarely in the realm of what the haters brand as "a solution looking for a problem".

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#39
post #12

I see such behavior from time to time but feels off-taste IMHO. It's almost as if would be more professional if they worked with the Italian mafia to coerce for payment(not that I approve such thing). If contract broken, sue them. Why throwing a scene?

because social shaming is faster and cheaper than the legal system and doesn’t involve physical violence like the mafia

I guess its something you can do if you don't care about your reputation and you need the money now, this is because It's very uncomfortable to work with people who throw a scene just like that.

We haven't heard the other side of the argument, have we? Maybe it's not as simple as services delivered payment withheld.

Re: A web developer posted a payment shaming message on their client's site

#40

As much as I want to side with the developers I think they are exposing themselves to legal repercussions and made their situation worse.

I agree, if only because the UK seems to be the florida of goofball defamation cases. And while I do think the developer would win their case, having to field one at all really sucks.
Post reply on HN