Live data from Hacker News

I program without syntax highlighting

hakon.gylterud.net

31–40 of 70 posts

Re: I program without syntax highlighting

#32
As usual, I read the code sample before reading the article:

    for (i=0;i
There's no way it's mentally just as easy for me to find that error without syntax highlighting.

It may be just slightly more difficult, but then it's death by a thousand paper cuts if I'm reading code for 6-12 hours a day.

Re: I program without syntax highlighting

#34
I program without syntax highlighting. Comes from a combination of learning shell scripts within vi (not vim) and the bloatedness of syntax highlighting and autocomplete nonsense. Coding without it all is a nice way to ensure that everything can be encapsulated within your brain. Leads to different abstractions and such. It's fun and I highly recommend it.

Also, the comments in here are really strangely negative. Let people have their preferences, weirdos.

Also also: so much of syntax highlighting and such is designed by people without color blindness. So a lot of syntax highlighting just doesn't work for me. It's wild to me that color blind people still have to be vocal about it.

Re: I program without syntax highlighting

#36
>The first thing one thinks when going from highlighted to unhighlighted code might be «This code is just a grey mash of symbols». Though, this sensation quickly fades as one gets engaged in the code. This “getting in to the groove”-part of the programming session is remarkably short, and afterwards code is more readable than English.

>If the code is neatly organised, the «grey mash» quickly crystalises into a beautiful little universe of logically connected parts; each standing by it self, on its own line or in its own scope, but referencing each other in clear and beautiful ways

Delusions packaged as deep insights.

Re: I program without syntax highlighting

#40

I program with syntax highlighting. I'm not convinced by the arguments of the article: - actively clicking on matching parentheses has the benefit of selecting that part - being more sensitive to the "beauty" of the code I think syntax highlighting doesn't get in the way of these two points. The only valid point: - No syntax highlighting automatically supports all languages True I guess. In the sense that no shoes su…

“no syntax highlighting supports all languages, therefore I don’t use any syntax highlighting” is not even a logical argument.
Post reply on HN