31–40 of 272 posts
It's still not available in the API despite them announcing the availability. They even linked to their Image Playground where it's also not available.. I updated my local playground to support it and I'm just handling the 404 on the model gracefully https://github.com/alasano/gpt-image-1-playground
Unlike Nano Banana it allows generating photos of children. Always fun to ask AI to imagine children of a couple but it's also kinda concerning that there might be terrible use cases.
Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?
Even from their own curated examples, this looks quite a bit worse than nano banan in terms of preserving consistency on image edits.
This tool is keeping my look the same.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really, but there's a number of theories. The simplest one is that they "style tuned" the AI on human preference data, and this introduced a subtle bias for yellow. And I say "subtle" - but because that model would always "regenerate" an image when editing, it would introduce more and more of this yellow tint with each tweak or edit. Which has a way of making a "subtle" bias anything but.
There was also the theory that is was because they scanned a bunch of actual real books and book paper has a slight yellow hue.
I really hope everyone is starting to get disillusioned with OpenAI. They're just charging you more and more for what? Shitty images that are easy to sniff out?
In that case, I have a startup for you to invest in. Its a bridge-selling app.
Another bunch of "startups" have been eliminated.
Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?