Last time I tried everything I could to prevent Firefox from calling home, it was still requesting Mozilla servers. Though I haven’t given up, my plan is disabling it at source code level and build my own release.
Firefox expands fingerprint protections
31–40 of 177 posts
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#32Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#33>Having a unique fingerprint means fingerprinters can continuously identify you invisibly This is not right. If you have a unique fingerprint every time someone tries to fingerprint you, then they have to do extra work to try and figure out which are the same. If you make it always be the same you've made the fingerprinter's job much easier.
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#34They could not build a profile on you and it would break their system of tracking user login per device.
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#35Fingerprinting is nearly impossible to resist these days anyways, no matter which technics Firefox uses to reduce it, and sometimes it actually makes the browser appear more unique. Last time I tried everything I could to prevent Firefox from calling home, it was still requesting Mozilla servers. Though I haven’t given up, my plan is disabling it at source code level and build my own release.
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#36One thing I found that broke tracking algorithms was the ‘every tab is a new random profile’ extension. I can’t remember the name as I haven’t used it in a while and it broke a lot of logins. They could not build a profile on you and it would break their system of tracking user login per device.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/temporary-con...
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#37Unless they tackle all the hidden things, all artifacts, canvas rendering and many more.
These companies will be actually happy after this change, because even users with ublock and other plugins, will think they're not tracked. Yeah, nope.
And it's not that hard to see how they fingerprint your browser, reverse any JS tracking script yourself and see.
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#38I tested firefox recently. It had some AI summary button or something that was new. I instantly wanted to eliminate this from the UI but I don't know how to do that. I guess it is possible? But it probably requires some time and research; the thing I don't need or want this, it just takes away space. Then I remembered why I no longer use firefox. I believe we, as users, need to take back the open web. The days of som…
I use Firefox because it is better than Chrome, which is the only alternative I see. Do you use something else?
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#39I tested firefox recently. It had some AI summary button or something that was new. I instantly wanted to eliminate this from the UI but I don't know how to do that. I guess it is possible? But it probably requires some time and research; the thing I don't need or want this, it just takes away space. Then I remembered why I no longer use firefox. I believe we, as users, need to take back the open web. The days of som…
Started a fresh profile, but couldn't find an AI button. The AI stuff in the context menu? You can remove the chat bot functionality right there. As for the buttons, if there is an undesirable button, it should be removable via context menu or toolbar customization.
Re: Firefox expands fingerprint protections
#40I use FF and I paid for NYTimes. I was logged in, yet NYTimes constantly flagged my browser with a persistent captcha I couldn't bypass for months (across 2 different machines). It thought I was a bot because of the privacy features. So I cancelled my subscription using my phone.
Is there a reason to force all these bot checks on logged in accounts that are paying you money other than insanity? Surely you could just have a max monthly bandwidth limit per account and just stop worrying about this?