Live data from Hacker News

Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

ijmpr.in

31–40 of 241 posts

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#31

Most vitamins are a waste of time and money, some are even harmful[1], but there are a lot of people with D deficiency, especially in winter[2]. 1 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/17/2744#:~:text=highest%20... 2 https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/vitamin-d#edit-group-image--...

The issue I've found with these discussions is it appears there's mixed evidence on if vitamin D *supplementation* actually has a positive impact, regardless of vitamin D deficiency. In other words, is the deficiency causal or correlative.

I have no opinion on the matter, and am inclined to think there is at least some positive benefit. But YMMV

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#32
post #4

I live in Winnipeg, Manitoba where it is quite cold for a big majority of the year. I have dabbled with supplements because I get a couple of major colds every year. I've heard things like you only need 15 minutes of sunshine per day to get your recommended dose of Vitamin D, but I've also heard it can be quite bad for you if you have too much in your system (and it's hard for your body to flush excess amounts). If t…

You probably have to really try to take too much Vitamin D with any over the counter supplement ( It should be part of your standard blood tests so you should know if you're running high or low and your doctor can recommend or prescribe a good dose.

It's 50,000 weekly.

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's possible to overdose on Vitamin D, but you have to eat absurd amounts. Unless you eat the pills like candy, you're safe.

Untrue. Source: painful personal experience.

How much were you taking?

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#34

Most vitamins are a waste of time and money, some are even harmful[1], but there are a lot of people with D deficiency, especially in winter[2]. 1 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/17/2744#:~:text=highest%20... 2 https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/vitamin-d#edit-group-image--...

I don't agree. As with everything, it requires care. Taking a multivitamin and thinking you're good to go is delusional.

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#35

Most vitamins are a waste of time and money, some are even harmful[1], but there are a lot of people with D deficiency, especially in winter[2]. 1 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/17/2744#:~:text=highest%20... 2 https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/vitamin-d#edit-group-image--...

[flagged]

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#36
post #4

I live in Winnipeg, Manitoba where it is quite cold for a big majority of the year. I have dabbled with supplements because I get a couple of major colds every year. I've heard things like you only need 15 minutes of sunshine per day to get your recommended dose of Vitamin D, but I've also heard it can be quite bad for you if you have too much in your system (and it's hard for your body to flush excess amounts). If t…

First know that the body will stop making vitamin D before you reach overdose quantities. This means you should take vitamin D in the morning.m rather than the evening. Second know that vitamin D is fat soluble. So if you are losing weight, you can more easily overdose if you have high levels stored in your fat. Also know the body won’t absorb as much vitamin D if you don’t take it with fat.

This can make dosing tricky. You can be taking an amount that is safe right now, but then is too much later.

You can max out your body’s vitamin D production even on a cloudy day, though the sun’s angle of incidence effects production.

The body typically maxes production at something like 20k iu (pleae verify this number it has been a while since I learned it), so staying below this number should mostly safe.

The USDA has set its recommended daily allowance mostly to avoid rickets. It is largely considered too low a number for general well being.

I live in north western Washington, and previously used to combat seasonal affective disorder, with some pretty dark thoughts come february. Since I started taking 1k D3 some 20 years ago much of the seasonal mental health has gone away. I take 2k D3 consistently currently, and if I run out for more than a week my mood starts to deteriorate quickly. I still haven’t proved causation since there are likely reasons I’ve let myself run out of the supplement that long, but it is so consistent that I treat it as causal at this point. YMMV

Please do research above just asking a forum for dosing advice though. This is a well educated place, and I would very much trust it as a starting point, but there is a lot of good published content on the topic. Though, I admit google is so bad today, I might fail to find any of the content I referenced years ago… if you use chatgpt make sure to require references, and check them. I find that using multiple instances to review research references separately prevents some context based poisoning as well. And pointing out inconsistencies can be a good way to find nuance in a topic. Though sometimes LLM will just waffle, and the context may be done

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#37
post #31

Most vitamins are a waste of time and money, some are even harmful[1], but there are a lot of people with D deficiency, especially in winter[2]. 1 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/17/2744#:~:text=highest%20... 2 https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/vitamin-d#edit-group-image--...

The issue I've found with these discussions is it appears there's mixed evidence on if vitamin D *supplementation* actually has a positive impact, regardless of vitamin D deficiency. In other words, is the deficiency causal or correlative. I have no opinion on the matter, and am inclined to think there is at least some positive benefit. But YMMV

The problem is that vitamin D doesn’t absorb the same way for everyone.

If a 100 people take 50IU of Vitamin D, you get 100 different results.

Some get enough from minor sun exposure and maybe eating a fish now and then. Others need massive doses to get any results.

Re: Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels

#40
Unfortunately Vitamin D deficiency tests (probably it is not covered by your insurance), high dose supplements are currently pushed so much by Doctors I started to think this is almost a scam. Most of the research about the subject are very noisy and conflicting.
Post reply on HN