Chicken sized 74C object radiates at 2kW? Probably cools rather fast, but still feels like high number... Energy in general really feels weird, when you look at the numbers. Like potential energy or kinetic on relatively low speeds... And then compared to chemical energy... Edit: Also how do you get it there? Wouldn't you need to hit it with higher frequency to start with to get to temp?
How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
31–40 of 118 posts
Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#32Incredible. Was not expecting an answer that felt reachable.
If I had bothered to think I would have known this theoretically = being a physics and mecheng guy.
Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#33Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would be difficult to serve. Maybe shoot it into something like a bucket with a rim that’s curved inward, to direct the meals momentum back into the bucket. And, since the volume is more confined, it should have the benefit of slightly reducing the required kinetic cooking energy.
So, shoot it at the plate instead.
Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#35Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your intuition is right in this case. A 2kW oven is more than enough to heat small chicken up to temperature. The author lazily took the 165F temperature and put it into a blackbody calculator without converting the units. Anything but the metric system... Assuming the chicken has a surface area A=1m^2 (corresponding to a perfectly spherical chicken of radius=25cm/diameter=50cm, a little bigger than usual) and is a p…
points for'a perfectly spherical chicken'.
Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would be difficult to serve. Maybe shoot it into something like a bucket with a rim that’s curved inward, to direct the meals momentum back into the bucket. And, since the volume is more confined, it should have the benefit of slightly reducing the required kinetic cooking energy.
So, shoot it at the plate instead.
Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#38Clearly, we could simply knock its head off with a bat, since today I learned you can physically cook chickens with bats and professional batters, via a method well suited to humanity's eminent migration to outer space.
But I expect with some years of strength training and finesse, a very hard flick to the back of the chicken's lower noggin could dislodge the first cervical vertebrate from the skull, severing the spinal cord's integration with the brain stem.
Whether actually dead, or merely in a persistent vegetative state, the chicken may now be cooked.
However, if the chicken is merely headless [0], but in good health, one should not cook it.
Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#39Re: How hard do you have to hit a chicken to cook it? (2020)
#40I don’t think I agree with the assertion that instantly bringing the chicken up to temp wouldn’t result in it being cooked. Especially since the classic solution got the chicken up to 400F. I don’t care how fast it cools off, if we assume magic uniform heat distribution from the slap, starting at 400 F, all the proteins are gonna be denatured and the diseases killed.