Earlier quoted context omitted.
Turnabout is fair play, it's not hypocrisy, it's actually resentment.
Whatever happened to "be the better man". Stoop to the perceived level of your worst enemy and you're just like you perceive them to be. Kirk shouldn't have died. But he also didn't say very nice things about people who aren't white males. There's a difference between celebrating his death and merely saying "he wasn't a very nice person unless you were white and male". Unfortunately, those two are being conflated. Th…
Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
31–40 of 50 posts
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. It was a big news story that the administration yanked visas and green cards for pro Palestine protestors.
Specifically because they protested and not for any other reason (such as, for example, specific actions taken at the protest; or just opportunistically because appearing at the protest made it possible to catch someone that they'd already been looking for)? And there was evidence for this?
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are correct in your assumption that I am a conservative, but I abhor the lunacy of the MAGA right as much as anyone. But the fact remains that the roots of this behavior are in men like Foucault and Marcuse, who were squarely on the left.
So just to be clear - by " abhor the lunacy of the MAGA right " you mean you did not vote for the current crop societal arsonists and otherwise generally denounce them, right? I ask because there is a common disingenuous pattern of people claiming to distance themselves from the methods or other things they find distasteful (eg the profligate deficit spending), but ultimately still falling in line with support.
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
What an appalling comment. You can’t possibly justify what you’re doing so you pretend it’s something “the left” did first. Did the left deport students because they wrote an op-ed article, or went to a protest? Did senior administration officials call for jailing opponents for thought crimes?
Required ‘diversity and inclusion’ statements amount to a political litmus test for hiring - https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-universitys-new-loyalty-oat...
Diversity Statements Required for One-Fifth of Academic Jobs - https://www.schoolinfosystem.org/2021/11/11/study-diversity-...
Berkeley Weeded Out Job Applicants Who Didn't Propose Specific Plans To Advance Diversity - https://reason.com/2020/02/03/university-of-california-diver...
A recent report from the Goldwater Institute found that 80% of job postings for Arizona’s public universities required applicants to submit a statement detailing their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. - https://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/policy-report/the-new-loy...
Mathematicians divided over faculty hiring practices that require proof of efforts to promote diversity - https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/mathematicians-divid...
“If you write: ‘I believe that everyone should be treated equally,’ you will be branded as a right winger,” Vinod Aggarwal, the chair of Asian Studies at the university, said in an interview. - https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/us/ucla-dei-statement.htm...
UC Berkeley’s rubric for evaluating diversity statements penalized candidates for saying that they prefer to “treat everyone the same,” or for objecting to racially segregated affinity groups. As my reporting has shown, by the early 2020s, the Berkeley rubric had become something of a gold standard, used by search committees across the country, including at the University of New Mexico, University of South Carolina, Northwestern University, and Ohio State University. - https://www.city-journal.org/article/a-death-knell-for-diver...
(to debunk the usual counterpoint that these diversity requirements merely test for being able and willing to teach all demographics of students)
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Turnabout is fair play, it's not hypocrisy, it's actually resentment.
Whatever happened to "be the better man". Stoop to the perceived level of your worst enemy and you're just like you perceive them to be. Kirk shouldn't have died. But he also didn't say very nice things about people who aren't white males. There's a difference between celebrating his death and merely saying "he wasn't a very nice person unless you were white and male". Unfortunately, those two are being conflated. Th…
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Turnabout is fair play, it's not hypocrisy, it's actually resentment.
Whatever happened to "be the better man". Stoop to the perceived level of your worst enemy and you're just like you perceive them to be. Kirk shouldn't have died. But he also didn't say very nice things about people who aren't white males. There's a difference between celebrating his death and merely saying "he wasn't a very nice person unless you were white and male". Unfortunately, those two are being conflated. Th…
It didn't work. People are now trying things that work.
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#37Says a lot that the very first person listed on that 'charliesmurders.com' site isn't condemning or mocking Kirk at all but just expressing anxiety about the likelihood of a political backlash following his death. Even the people on 4chan were expressing confusion about this and saying her remarks seemed wholly innocuous.
The point is anything less than expressions of mourning is considered "violent rhetoric" by the same right-wingers who were radio silent when Melissa Hortman was murdered, and who made jokes when Paul Pelosi was bludgeoned with a hammer.
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#38Says a lot that the very first person listed on that 'charliesmurders.com' site isn't condemning or mocking Kirk at all but just expressing anxiety about the likelihood of a political backlash following his death. Even the people on 4chan were expressing confusion about this and saying her remarks seemed wholly innocuous.
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whatever happened to "be the better man". Stoop to the perceived level of your worst enemy and you're just like you perceive them to be. Kirk shouldn't have died. But he also didn't say very nice things about people who aren't white males. There's a difference between celebrating his death and merely saying "he wasn't a very nice person unless you were white and male". Unfortunately, those two are being conflated. Th…
We don't know the motivation of the killer. Seems best to wait before inventing a motive.
Is there any actual reliable source for this other than a statement from someone that amounts to "I don't know, but wouldn't surprise me"?
Re: Mass Firings for Charlie Kirk Comments Appear Coordinated
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
So just to be clear - by " abhor the lunacy of the MAGA right " you mean you did not vote for the current crop societal arsonists and otherwise generally denounce them, right? I ask because there is a common disingenuous pattern of people claiming to distance themselves from the methods or other things they find distasteful (eg the profligate deficit spending), but ultimately still falling in line with support.
Not disingenuous, I think. I did vote for Trump, and even if I had a crystal ball in November and knew then what I know now, I would still prefer him to Harris. On the other hand, I have been quite vocal in my criticism of him -- but the circle of friends and acquaintances who have heard my criticisms is pretty small.