Live data from Hacker News

How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

data.iana.org

31–40 of 177 posts

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#31

.calvinklein, .homedepot - how do these things get created, can you just go to namecheap.com and make your own tld?

If you pay ICANN hundreds of thousands of dollars, you can get basically any .word domain. I believe the only actual requirement is that it has to be 3 characters or longer, as two characters are reserved for countries.

Application fee with ICANN: $185k, non-refundable,

Yearly fee: $25k

Technical backend with Verisign: $200k per year

Add maybe $100k of lawyer fees.

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you pay ICANN hundreds of thousands of dollars, you can get basically any .word domain. I believe the only actual requirement is that it has to be 3 characters or longer, as two characters are reserved for countries.

Imagine having the domain cyber[.]threat Would be kind of cool, most attacked domain on the web, probably

I think my top three worst ideas someone actually paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for are .sucks, .ooo, and .hiv.

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#33
post #29
post #3

> The Ismaili Imamat is a supra-national entity, representing the succession of Imams since the time of the Prophet Muhammad. ( https://ismaili.imamat/#introduction ) The Aga Khan is the leader of the Ismaili Imamat. They have as good a claim to a TLD as Berlin, if not more.

There's also .va for the Vatican and .lds for the Mormon faith (and .mormon), and more generic Christian ones like .church. I didn't find any for other religions on a casual search, perhaps because many of them don't have the same degree of centralization.

The Vatican is a country, so it gets a ccTLD.

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#34
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's also .va for the Vatican and .lds for the Mormon faith (and .mormon), and more generic Christian ones like .church. I didn't find any for other religions on a casual search, perhaps because many of them don't have the same degree of centralization.

The Vatican is a country, so it gets a ccTLD.

True but I don't think the distinction matters to the overall point that it's perfectly ordinary for religious institutions to operate a TLD, regardless of the mechanism that allows for it.

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#35
post #21

Presumably way the same as .google and all the other special-purpose organization-specific domains. Blame ICANN for allowing any public or private organization who can meet the requirements to buy and operate a gTLD back in 2012: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/global-support/faqs... And as per another comment in this thread, they’re doing another round of this in 2026: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4…

Time for another DNS root system. Maybe. /s

The Open Root Server Confederation has long since been wound up. But some of the other alternative root servers are still around even now. One example:

https://wiki.opennic.org/opennic/dot

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#36
post #29
post #3

> The Ismaili Imamat is a supra-national entity, representing the succession of Imams since the time of the Prophet Muhammad. ( https://ismaili.imamat/#introduction ) The Aga Khan is the leader of the Ismaili Imamat. They have as good a claim to a TLD as Berlin, if not more.

There's also .va for the Vatican and .lds for the Mormon faith (and .mormon), and more generic Christian ones like .church. I didn't find any for other religions on a casual search, perhaps because many of them don't have the same degree of centralization.

.islam is proposed but contested: https://icannwiki.org/.islam

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#38
post #14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Genuine question: why “blame”? Does it really matter?

yes blame. ofcourse it matters. tld use to be good insight into the purpose of the website. IE, google.com, or wikipedia.org

With some exceptions (.gov, .edu, for example), it has never actually meant anything. Anyone can register a .com, .net, or .org for any purpose.

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#39
.george is a pretty funny one. apparently Walmart owns it, so you probably won't be able to register a .george domain any time soon.

https://icannwiki.org/.george

do companies even use these in the wild or are they buying these TLDs for nothing? ".brother", ".canon", ".nokia", ".panasonic", ".playstation", ".xbox", ".xerox"... there's even ".sandvikcoromant", which is some sort of Swedish metalwork company.

Re: How did .agakhan, .ismaili and .imamat get their own TLDs?

#40

Presumably way the same as .google and all the other special-purpose organization-specific domains. Blame ICANN for allowing any public or private organization who can meet the requirements to buy and operate a gTLD back in 2012: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/global-support/faqs... And as per another comment in this thread, they’re doing another round of this in 2026: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4…

The fact that private entities can monopolize gTLDs, including words that aren't even made-up or reasonably copy-written (e.g. the MAN group in Europe owns .man) was an embarrassing and dishonorable decision by ICANN. I'm all for having tons of weird, awesome gTLDs, and I'm even for brand-specific gTLDs like .google, but the cost these entities should incur by asking for one to be created is: Anyone can use it.

1. A set number of slots should be opened every 10 years (e.g. 250 new gTLDs every ten years).

2. Entities submit bids for the gTLD slots, in terms of dollars. The 250 highest bids win.

3. If your entity wins a slot, you submit the gTLD you want, and there's a public comment period where claims against the gTLD being created are heard (e.g. if you own the copyright in some jurisdiction and someone else is trying to register it, submit a claim).

4. If it passes, your entity is allowed to register a set number of TLDs on the gTLD (e.g. 100) before anyone else gets access. This is what you bought: The fact that the gTLD exists, and the first 100 domain names on it without competition).

5. It then becomes a real gTLD.

Some variant of this is how it always should have worked, and entities like Google should be forced into a sophie's choice: They could fight .google indefinitely, win, and it'll never become a gTLD, or they could sponsor it, claim the first N domain names, but otherwise make it available to everyone. Of course, they might actually have valid jurisdictional claims against anyone else who tries to register a .google domain on copyright grounds, so maybe they fight and win in the courts against anyone who tries to use it; but the point is that it shouldn't be ICANN's decision.

Post reply on HN