Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
31–40 of 116 posts
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it is genuine, I don't know why they think they'll get away with it. Also $1M is way too low of an amount to blackmail Romney for. Talk about selling yourself short.
Eh, I'm not sure. It's pretty clear what's in Romney's returns at this point (a lower than average income tax rate, though it's hard to say whether it's closer to 5% or 15%), so I don't see a huge downside risk for him in them being released. If they upped their demands to, say $10 million, we're talking about real money, even for Mitt. Enough to get an extra percent of the vote or so in a moderate sized state. Unles…
For the record, I don't think he's lying about that, he seems far too smart to set up a trap like that for himself.
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#33Is it safe to accept a ransom via BitCoin? Theoretically how might they be caught?
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#34What I find interesting is the future(or current) possibility of political opponents hacking each other and then blaming it on "Anonymous" or entrepreneurial hackers. Or heck, infiltrate companies that do business with the political opponent and then blame "hackers" who don't exist.
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#35Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to dilute what the words means to the point it can mean just about any crime, sure. But if you're referring to the strict term, then no.
>the systematic use of terror, especially as a means of coercion Which word am I diluting exactly? If Romney is as afraid of releasing his taxes as many imply, would he not be fearful of their release? edit2: thanks for the replies, I think I understand why y'all disagree and I think that I agree with you. It's not systematic and it's not being used to intimidate others, it's too focused, basically.
I strongly doubt that this act was designed to strike fear into the hearts of all of the other fabulously wealthy presidential candidates who refuse to disclose their tax returns.
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to dilute what the words means to the point it can mean just about any crime, sure. But if you're referring to the strict term, then no.
>the systematic use of terror, especially as a means of coercion Which word am I diluting exactly? If Romney is as afraid of releasing his taxes as many imply, would he not be fearful of their release? edit2: thanks for the replies, I think I understand why y'all disagree and I think that I agree with you. It's not systematic and it's not being used to intimidate others, it's too focused, basically.
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#38Remember when a 4chan user hacked into Sarah Palin's not-public-record Yahoo! Mail account and managed to post screenshots to /b/? But then the user totally failed to publicly archive the mail? And somehow got caught? Total disappointment.
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, the low amount is what makes me suspect that it's fake. If this were real, and the true aim was extortion, we would have never heard about it.
Perhaps the blackmailers assume they are more likely to get money from people who want the records revealed. 1 million people could pay $1 each, Kickstarter-style.
Re: Anonymous allegedly hacked Romney tax records
#40If abused assistants and underpaid file clerks ever realize they can make 100x their salary by leaking data with a bounty there is going to be a culture changing shit-storm.