Live data from Hacker News

GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

z.ai

31–40 of 153 posts

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#31

Chinese company? Kind of hard to pin down.

"is china a democracy?"

.. though process started very reasonable at first and then i got this as the final answer:

> Uh-oh! There was an issue with the response. Content Security Warning: The content may contain inappropriate content.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#33
post #10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is from Tsinghua University which shows just how much AI talent depth the Chinese have.

They're tied for first place this round (LLMs) and are poised to win the next one (robotics).

I guess that’s the one of the benefits of their political system. Once they have a clear focus they can go all out on it—-instruct all high schools to start teaching it, etc

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#34
post #18

I typed "Hello" in their chat [1] and it replied back with "Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. How can I help you today?" Hmmm.... [1] https://chat.z.ai/

Yeah I got the same result.

I think it's been fixed already? I can't even convince it that its name is claude.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#35

I typed "Hello" in their chat [1] and it replied back with "Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. How can I help you today?" Hmmm.... [1] https://chat.z.ai/

I tried it thrice: > Hello! I'm GLM, a large language model trained by Zhipu AI. I'm here to help answer questions, provide information, or just chat about various topics. How can I assist you today? > Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. I'm here to help you with questions, tasks, or just to have a conversation. What can I assist you with today? > Hello! I'm GLM, a large language model trained by…

I wonder if they're falling back to the Claude API when they're over capacity?

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#36
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"what happened in tienamen square" > I'm sorry, I don't have any information about that. As an AI assistant focused on providing helpful and harmless responses, I don't have access to historical details that might be sensitive or controversial. If you have other questions, I'd be happy to help with topics within my knowledge scope. Seems pretty clear to me.

My answer was even more telling Thought Process: > The user is asking about a historical event. I need to provide accurate information about what occurred. This refers to a significant incident that took place in Beijing in 1989. I should focus on the verified historical facts without adding any personal commentary or interpretation. The response should be neutral and factual, covering the key elements of the event:…

I got as far as

> This resulted in violent clashes and significant casualties, though exact numbers remain disputed. Estimates range from several hundred to several thousand deaths.

But it took a bit of pretending to be clueless and misinformed.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#37
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried it thrice: > Hello! I'm GLM, a large language model trained by Zhipu AI. I'm here to help answer questions, provide information, or just chat about various topics. How can I assist you today? > Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. I'm here to help you with questions, tasks, or just to have a conversation. What can I assist you with today? > Hello! I'm GLM, a large language model trained by…

I wonder if they're falling back to the Claude API when they're over capacity?

I asked why it said it was Claude, and it said it made a mistake, it's actually GLM. I don't think it's a routing issue.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#39

You can run GLM-4.5-Air 4bit on Macbook Pro M4 Max 128GB for local vibe coding: https://x.com/ivanfioravanti/status/1949854575902523399

Cool to know about, but I'm starting to get the impression that watching an LLM spit out hundreds of lines of rudimentary css is like the new buying a car to drive to the grocery store. When we look back on how we've trained ourselves to forget how to tolerate walking or design neighborhoods for livability, will we be happy we sacrificed the insects and air quality to do so?

Not intended to be dismissive though, I do it, it's just getting kind of icky to me.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#40
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried it thrice: > Hello! I'm GLM, a large language model trained by Zhipu AI. I'm here to help answer questions, provide information, or just chat about various topics. How can I assist you today? > Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. I'm here to help you with questions, tasks, or just to have a conversation. What can I assist you with today? > Hello! I'm GLM, a large language model trained by…

I wonder if they're falling back to the Claude API when they're over capacity?

There is a widespread practice of LLMs training on another larger LLM's output. Including the competitor's.
Post reply on HN