31–40 of 147 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll never understand why people do free dev work for multinational trillion dollar conglomerates.
Could say the same thing about open source software.
> We reported the vulnerability to Microsoft in April and they have since fixed it as a moderate severity vulnerability. As only important and critical vulnerabilities qualify for a bounty award, we did not receive anything, except for an acknowledgement on the Security Researcher Acknowledgments for Microsoft Online Services webpage. I guess it makes sense that a poor little indie company like Microsoft can't pay bu…
I'll never understand why people do free dev work for multinational trillion dollar conglomerates.
> We reported the vulnerability to Microsoft in April and they have since fixed it as a moderate severity vulnerability. As only important and critical vulnerabilities qualify for a bounty award, we did not receive anything, except for an acknowledgement on the Security Researcher Acknowledgments for Microsoft Online Services webpage. I guess it makes sense that a poor little indie company like Microsoft can't pay bu…
I'll never understand why people do free dev work for multinational trillion dollar conglomerates.
Earlier LLMs used to be a goldmine for company secrets (when it learned documents that shouldn't be on public internet). Most of it seem to be scrubbed now.
There was a boba tea company that had a free, no-sign-in required LLM that I used to generate a few bash scripts before ChatGPT free-tier started.
Earlier LLMs used to be a goldmine for company secrets (when it learned documents that shouldn't be on public internet). Most of it seem to be scrubbed now.
Sounds fake. LLMs don't usually memorize things that appear once in their training set anyway, nor have I heard about major issues accidentally training on a bunch of non-public data.
I can see how someone would believe it to be true though, since LLMs can easily hallucinate in a way that looks like this is true.
> We reported the vulnerability to Microsoft in April and they have since fixed it as a moderate severity vulnerability. As only important and critical vulnerabilities qualify for a bounty award, we did not receive anything, except for an acknowledgement on the Security Researcher Acknowledgments for Microsoft Online Services webpage. I guess it makes sense that a poor little indie company like Microsoft can't pay bu…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could say the same thing about open source software.
It's why I don't understand why people believe in "open source". Why would I contribute free dev work to a billion dollar corporation? I do believe in "Free Software" which is contributing free dev work to my fellow man for the benefit of all man mankind.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could say the same thing about open source software.
It's why I don't understand why people believe in "open source". Why would I contribute free dev work to a billion dollar corporation? I do believe in "Free Software" which is contributing free dev work to my fellow man for the benefit of all man mankind.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's why I don't understand why people believe in "open source". Why would I contribute free dev work to a billion dollar corporation? I do believe in "Free Software" which is contributing free dev work to my fellow man for the benefit of all man mankind.
This may be a misconception. "Free software" (e.g. Linux) also benefits billion-dollar corporations and "open source" also benefits all mankind.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's why I don't understand why people believe in "open source". Why would I contribute free dev work to a billion dollar corporation? I do believe in "Free Software" which is contributing free dev work to my fellow man for the benefit of all man mankind.
This may be a misconception. "Free software" (e.g. Linux) also benefits billion-dollar corporations and "open source" also benefits all mankind.