31–40 of 59 posts
Look at those people shouting this will be AGI / total disruption etc. Seems Elon managed one thing; to amass the dumbest folks together. 99.99% maga, crypto and almost markov chain quality comments.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is what put me off Claude Code. When I wanted. To dig in, I tried to watch a few Youtube videos to see an expert's opinion it, and 90% people who talk about it feel like former crypto shills, who, from their channel history, seem like have never written a single line of code without AI in their lives.
As someone who doesn't keep track of the influencer scene at the moment because I am way addicted to building... You should totally give Claude Code a try. The biggest problem is that it is glaze-optimized, so have to work at getting it to not treat you like the biggest genius of all time. But when you manage to get in a good flow with it, and your project is very predictably searchable, results start to be quite hel…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is what put me off Claude Code. When I wanted. To dig in, I tried to watch a few Youtube videos to see an expert's opinion it, and 90% people who talk about it feel like former crypto shills, who, from their channel history, seem like have never written a single line of code without AI in their lives.
It annoys me to experience the huge discrepancy between content on social media on AI versus actual enterprise use. AI is happening, it's absolutely becoming integral parts of many businesses including our own. But these guys are just doodling in MS Paint and they're flooding the channels.
I can count on my hands the number of enterprises that actually have AI models of their own.
Look at those people shouting this will be AGI / total disruption etc. Seems Elon managed one thing; to amass the dumbest folks together. 99.99% maga, crypto and almost markov chain quality comments.
I'll believe in AGI when OpenAI stops paying human developers.
The fact that I see people being paid to dig a trench does not make me doubt the existence of trenching machines. It just means that the tool is not always the best choice for every job.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It annoys me to experience the huge discrepancy between content on social media on AI versus actual enterprise use. AI is happening, it's absolutely becoming integral parts of many businesses including our own. But these guys are just doodling in MS Paint and they're flooding the channels.
Enterprises are in the same situation as you are. Many of them are posting marketing about AI without actually having AI. They are using OpenAI API's to say they have AI. I can count on my hands the number of enterprises that actually have AI models of their own.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe you should use a reasoning model. Got this from O3, which took 1m31s to think about the answer: https://chatgpt.com/s/t_687b9221fb748191af4e30f597f18443 Bottom line: Your 5800X3D + 64 GB RAM + RTX 3090 will run Kimi K2’s 1.8‑bit build, but response times feel more like a leisurely typewriter than a snappy chatbot. If you want comfortable day‑to‑day use, plan either a RAM upgrade or a second (or bigger) GPU—or j…
I second this. o3 is pretty spot on while 4o answered exactly like what the parent got. I rarely use 4o anymore for anything. Rather would I wait for o3 than quickly get a pile of rubbish.
o3 all the way for anything needing analysis or creative thought.
It's strange that none of these $100s bn+ companies fund empirical research into the effects of AI tools on actual job roles as part of their "benchmarks". Oh wait, no its not.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It annoys me to experience the huge discrepancy between content on social media on AI versus actual enterprise use. AI is happening, it's absolutely becoming integral parts of many businesses including our own. But these guys are just doodling in MS Paint and they're flooding the channels.
Enterprises are in the same situation as you are. Many of them are posting marketing about AI without actually having AI. They are using OpenAI API's to say they have AI. I can count on my hands the number of enterprises that actually have AI models of their own.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
99% of AI influencers are the same people who emailed you pictures as a Word attachment a year ago.
This is what put me off Claude Code. When I wanted. To dig in, I tried to watch a few Youtube videos to see an expert's opinion it, and 90% people who talk about it feel like former crypto shills, who, from their channel history, seem like have never written a single line of code without AI in their lives.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Enterprises are in the same situation as you are. Many of them are posting marketing about AI without actually having AI. They are using OpenAI API's to say they have AI. I can count on my hands the number of enterprises that actually have AI models of their own.
just curious, why does an enterprise have to have their own model? company can use ____ (someone else’s model) and still accomplish amazing AI shit in their products