Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is the trilogy any good? Im just about to finish blindsight
I really quite enjoyed it but thought it got a little weird towards the end. The initial premise is quite great
Human Brain Cells on Chip for Sale – First biocomputing platform hits the market
31–37 of 37 posts
Re: Human Brain Cells on Chip for Sale – First biocomputing platform hits the market
#32How does this compare to a conventional CPU or GPU in terms of flops per second? Or does this not present a traditional architecture?
Re: Human Brain Cells on Chip for Sale – First biocomputing platform hits the market
#33This may be the shortcut to an AI 1,000 smarter than a human.
Well, there are humans, and then, there are former US presidents. I never regarded "Hot Shots" as a documentary, but, i was young, when i first saw it.
Re: Human Brain Cells on Chip for Sale – First biocomputing platform hits the market
#34The article says: "The first 115 units will begin shipping this summer at $35,000 each" From Cortical's home page [1]: "We're a revolutionary biotech firm based in Melbourne, Australia." Melbourne is the capital city of the Australian state of Victoria. Part VIII, Section 38, paragraph (1) of the Victorian "Human Tissue Act 1982" says: "Subject to this section, a person shall not sell, or agree to sell, tissue (inclu…
Re: Human Brain Cells on Chip for Sale – First biocomputing platform hits the market
#35How does this compare to a conventional CPU or GPU in terms of flops per second? Or does this not present a traditional architecture?
Seriously brains are neither analog nor digital, they use spike-trains. Very comparable to "clockless" digital circuits. To what we use in chips, synchronized tick-based calculation: it's not comparable. Judging by human but especially animal reaction times: one way to quantify it is to say it has about 10000 flop per second. technically the human head has 2 speeds: one type of cells with 1000 synapses, that can calculate about 10 times per second (the "animal brain" or reptile brain, the cortex). And there are cells with 10000 synapses that fire on average 1 time per second (the "human brain", the neocortex), which should be roughly the same capacity. Of this network type it is known that more synapses means more accurate, more long-term planning. Faster firing means faster responses. Reptiles are stupid, but despite reptiles being cold blooded we mammals have zero chance to respond in time to an attack. It's not happening. And yes, cats have a built-in trick that gives them a fighting chance, but is only ever going to work in small animals (you need muscles powerful enough to throw yourself several body lengths into the air, and you need to be small and light enough that you survive being thrown in the air several body lengths without coordination, and land without injury. Both properties that humans, or any animal 1m or bigger will never have. And of course, that reflex is an incredible source of youtube videos)
The problem with spike trains is that it's tough to say if a zero signal means anything. On the one hand, all zeros means the cell isn't using energy, and that is incredibly efficient (nanowatt, not even multiple nanowatts). Everything about your mind is designed to almost always be all zeros. A spike means milliwatt power usage for .15-.2 seconds after the spike. Given the amount of neurons, our brain would rapidly cook itself if the average firing rate even just double, in fact that is exactly what happens with epilepsy patients.
The above calculations only apply if all zeros means the network isn't doing anything. If that assumption is wrong, you should probably multiply those figures with the temporal accuracy of the spikes, which is incredible, 3-4 nanosecond. So you'd have to multiply the figures by 300 million, at which point the human mind still is 1000 times stronger than even a full stargate deployment. That sounds incredible, but it really isn't.
If you want to see incredible figures, figure out how much calculations natural selection does for a simple ocean-based bacterial species (assuming 1 cell division = one calculation, if you assume a more reasonable 1 allele combination = 1 flop, you're another 3-5 orders of magnitude higher). Bacteria do hundreds of orders of magnitude more thinking than all humans combined.
Re: Human Brain Cells on Chip for Sale – First biocomputing platform hits the market
#36How does this compare to a conventional CPU or GPU in terms of flops per second? Or does this not present a traditional architecture?
How about: it's flopPY, every second? Seriously brains are neither analog nor digital, they use spike-trains. Very comparable to "clockless" digital circuits. To what we use in chips, synchronized tick-based calculation: it's not comparable. Judging by human but especially animal reaction times: one way to quantify it is to say it has about 10000 flop per second. technically the human head has 2 speeds: one type of c…
Re: Human Brain Cells on Chip for Sale – First biocomputing platform hits the market
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about: it's flopPY, every second? Seriously brains are neither analog nor digital, they use spike-trains. Very comparable to "clockless" digital circuits. To what we use in chips, synchronized tick-based calculation: it's not comparable. Judging by human but especially animal reaction times: one way to quantify it is to say it has about 10000 flop per second. technically the human head has 2 speeds: one type of c…
That was very interesting. Do you have relevant reading material to recommend, good sources?