It is always fascinating to see how much influence authors and scientists have had on each other throughout history. You sometimes see clear examples of how fiction fuels technology, and sometimes technology inspires fiction. As a writer who hasn’t been published yet, I find that most of my stories start by imagining where today’s science might take us next, though every now and then, I catch a glimpse of something t…
as a high schooler I took a summer class in “reading & writing scifi” offered by MIT Junction. it was very influential on my intellectual development and after that I focused myself on learning software and electronics, the only crafts I saw that could give me the power to pull parts of the visions into the present. a few weeks ago I started on a focused read of historical scifi, in chronological order, that had some…
Destination: Jupiter
31–40 of 44 posts
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#32Kind of hard for SF stories featuring organic life (i.e. humans) to be based around Jupiter because of the planet's incredibly strong magnetic field and hence killing radiation belts - like the Van Allen belts around Earth, but much worse. Probes to the Jovian system have to be heavily hardened.
If anybody is into sci-fi, I highly recommend The Three Body Problem series. I'm being very elusive here to avoid spoilers, but let's just say that there are some very fascinating challenging with establishing technology (and especially human life) around Jupiter, what with it's gravity, the radiation, it's moons, distance from the sun, etc. As a space nerd, those books were highly enjoyable
Any non-chinese character is evil for example, only chinese will inherit the right for their future. Western culture moved from such properly bad cliches long time ago for the better.
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Is the future mostly written by visionaries in fiction, or by the engineers and scientists bringing it to life? I find Charles Stross' blog to be quite informative. He has a tendency to predict a thing, write a book demonstrating how it will be good, and then absolutely hate the real world implications of the technology. Famously he picked up Nick Szabo's old whitepaper on smart contracts, and envisaged a world wher…
In general, people being people, it is always safe to assume that some will use a thing for its best purpose and others for its worst possible purpose.
I also get the impression that as people age they place an increasing value on safety and comfort. Change is the antithesis to that.
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#34Jupiter and Saturn moons always make inspiring hostnames. Right now, I have Callisto, Europa, and Ganymede. Ganymede has the most powerful setup. Yesterday, I decommissioned Io.
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#35It is always fascinating to see how much influence authors and scientists have had on each other throughout history. You sometimes see clear examples of how fiction fuels technology, and sometimes technology inspires fiction. As a writer who hasn’t been published yet, I find that most of my stories start by imagining where today’s science might take us next, though every now and then, I catch a glimpse of something t…
>Is the future mostly written by visionaries in fiction, or by the engineers and scientists bringing it to life? I find Charles Stross' blog to be quite informative. He has a tendency to predict a thing, write a book demonstrating how it will be good, and then absolutely hate the real world implications of the technology. Famously he picked up Nick Szabo's old whitepaper on smart contracts, and envisaged a world wher…
I would say his view of them is more Lovecraftian than "evil", but here's the speech (as a blog entry): https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2018/01/dude-yo...
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#36Jupiter and Saturn moons always make inspiring hostnames. Right now, I have Callisto, Europa, and Ganymede. Ganymede has the most powerful setup. Yesterday, I decommissioned Io.
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#37Kind of hard for SF stories featuring organic life (i.e. humans) to be based around Jupiter because of the planet's incredibly strong magnetic field and hence killing radiation belts - like the Van Allen belts around Earth, but much worse. Probes to the Jovian system have to be heavily hardened.
In case anybody’s interested, Malka Older has a really enjoyable series (two books so far) of short novels set on habitats in Jupiter’s atmosphere (so not breathable atmosphere, but also not vacuum). They’re solid mystery stories with fun characters and an intriguing setting. The first is called “The Mimicking of Known Successes” and the second is “The Imposition of Unnecessary Obstacles”.
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
If anybody is into sci-fi, I highly recommend The Three Body Problem series. I'm being very elusive here to avoid spoilers, but let's just say that there are some very fascinating challenging with establishing technology (and especially human life) around Jupiter, what with it's gravity, the radiation, it's moons, distance from the sun, etc. As a space nerd, those books were highly enjoyable
The tech/fantasy parts are great and were novel back then. But the characters were shallow, story so-so and ended in big meh, and overal it feels like chinese propaganda re freedom and future. Any non-chinese character is evil for example, only chinese will inherit the right for their future. Western culture moved from such properly bad cliches long time ago for the better.
Big disappointment, very much not what I think of as hard sci-fi which is what it often gets billed as, and I absolutely do not get the love for it here.
Don't get me wrong, there's some total dross out there that I adore, but this ain't it for me.
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
If anybody is into sci-fi, I highly recommend The Three Body Problem series. I'm being very elusive here to avoid spoilers, but let's just say that there are some very fascinating challenging with establishing technology (and especially human life) around Jupiter, what with it's gravity, the radiation, it's moons, distance from the sun, etc. As a space nerd, those books were highly enjoyable
The tech/fantasy parts are great and were novel back then. But the characters were shallow, story so-so and ended in big meh, and overal it feels like chinese propaganda re freedom and future. Any non-chinese character is evil for example, only chinese will inherit the right for their future. Western culture moved from such properly bad cliches long time ago for the better.
Re: Destination: Jupiter
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Is the future mostly written by visionaries in fiction, or by the engineers and scientists bringing it to life? I find Charles Stross' blog to be quite informative. He has a tendency to predict a thing, write a book demonstrating how it will be good, and then absolutely hate the real world implications of the technology. Famously he picked up Nick Szabo's old whitepaper on smart contracts, and envisaged a world wher…
In general, people being people, it is always safe to assume that some will use a thing for its best purpose and others for its worst possible purpose.