31–40 of 62 posts
I used to do paragliding and to me the video looks like low effort green screen more than AI. The colons don't behave like that when flying because you have a tension exactly as much as your weight and it will vibrate and jiggle as it is rare to have perfect laminar flow especially over land(it gets more stable at hight altitudes but not that stable). Also, you are supposed to have 30 to 60 kph wind blowing at you al…
AI has finally reached a point at which it can fake videos well enough that most people will believe it. Just in time for the fake Epstein suicide video! Epstein didn't kill himself, nor is he dead. He's living out his retirement on another pedo island, as a reward for a kompromate job well done.
I get the conspiracy that he was killed by people with something to cover up. But what is the motivation for rewarding him?
Unless you suppose he has a very compelling dead man's switch?
I used to do paragliding and to me the video looks like low effort green screen more than AI. The colons don't behave like that when flying because you have a tension exactly as much as your weight and it will vibrate and jiggle as it is rare to have perfect laminar flow especially over land(it gets more stable at hight altitudes but not that stable). Also, you are supposed to have 30 to 60 kph wind blowing at you al…
AI has finally reached a point at which it can fake videos well enough that most people will believe it. Just in time for the fake Epstein suicide video! Epstein didn't kill himself, nor is he dead. He's living out his retirement on another pedo island, as a reward for a kompromate job well done.
Based on what? I get the conspiracy that he was killed by people with something to cover up. But what is the motivation for rewarding him? Unless you suppose he has a very compelling dead man's switch?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Based on what? I get the conspiracy that he was killed by people with something to cover up. But what is the motivation for rewarding him? Unless you suppose he has a very compelling dead man's switch?
Not for a second that I believe the conspiracy, but he would be rewarded for taking the blame post-mortem so a lot of other rich people don't .
Whatever the outcome of this specific case, we are clearly at a tipping point in history - it’s now basically impossible to say for certain if a fake video is real, and potentially even more problematic - also impossible to say for sure that a real video is not fake. The whole concept of ‘video evidence’ is going up in smoke.
we need a modern 12 angry men were the main evidence is not testimony but AI video
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Based on what? I get the conspiracy that he was killed by people with something to cover up. But what is the motivation for rewarding him? Unless you suppose he has a very compelling dead man's switch?
Not for a second that I believe the conspiracy, but he would be rewarded for taking the blame post-mortem so a lot of other rich people don't .
(Not saying that he was, just that it seems the much more plausible theory than the reward one.)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
we need a modern 12 angry men were the main evidence is not testimony but AI video
Stabs a USB into the table And this identical footage of the judge doing the crime instead of the accused? Is this not plausible doubt?
Counsel comes to you with footage, you create equally-plausible false footage to highlight how the original is doubtable.