Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you tell me the reason you'd want to run a load balancer in front of a single instance? I read the feature spec for the elastic load balancer and can't it out.
There's 2 main reasons. 1, if the AZ that your single instance is running in dies completely, ELB can help fire up a new instance in another zone quickly without having to handle re-routing DNS, etc. 2 if you need extra capacity in a hurry (e.g. you just got linked from HN and 10,000 people sign up), you can add more instances without re-achitecting. Whether it's worth paying for those capabilities is always up to yo…
AWS Elastic Beanstalk now supports Python
31–35 of 35 posts
Re: AWS Elastic Beanstalk now supports Python
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
I never tried it but I guess you can use SQS for queues on AWS. http://aws.amazon.com/sqs/
If you go with SQS, keep in mind it doesn't guarantee that messages will be received exactly once[1]. I've used SQS for large projects and this was killer because we had to implement message locking ourselves to prevent messages from being processed twice. Since then, this has been a deal breaker for using SQS again (now use Celery). [1] http://aws.amazon.com/sqs/faqs/#How_many_times_will_I_receiv...
Re: AWS Elastic Beanstalk now supports Python
#33Anybody else looking to move from AppEngine? I can't wait to try this out, AppEngine has become too expensive and AWS has more and better deployment options, and more and better associated services.
Re: AWS Elastic Beanstalk now supports Python
#34Great day indeed to be a python developer. Greatly appreciated, thanks Amazon! Now, if you could support PostgreSQL in RDS, that would be a nice feat.
Re: AWS Elastic Beanstalk now supports Python
#35Is that really their official blog? I'm not usually one to care about a professional looking UI, but I feel like it matters here. A non tech boss is going to see this next to cloud.google and have a tremendous bias, regardless of what his/her tech people think