Live data from Hacker News

A Tiny Boltzmann Machine

eoinmurray.info

31–40 of 59 posts

Re: A Tiny Boltzmann Machine

#32
post #22

Fun article on David Ackley https://news.unm.edu/news/24-nobel-prize-in-physics-cited-gr... Do check out his T2 Tile Project.

The key takeaways are that there are lots of people involved with making these breakthroughs.

The value of grad students is often overlooked, they contribute so much and then later on advance the research even more.

Why does America look on research as a waste, when it has move everything so far?

Re: A Tiny Boltzmann Machine

#33

Now the real question: is it you enjoying that nice page or is it a Boltzmann Brain? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain

It doesn't matter.

It's Decartes demon all over again. Problem solved centuries ago. You can skin it however you want, it's the same problem.

Re: A Tiny Boltzmann Machine

#37
This is very well made, and so nostalgic to me! My whole PhD between 2012-16 was based on RBMs and I learned so much about generative ML through these models. Research has come so far and one doesn't hear much about them these days but they were really at the heart of the "AI Spring" back then.

Re: A Tiny Boltzmann Machine

#40
My understanding is that the Harmonium (Smolensky) was the first restricted Boltzmann machine, but maximized “harmony” instead of minimizing “energy.” When Smolensky, Hinton and Rummelhart collaborated, they instead called it “goodness of fit.”

The harmonium paper [1] is a really nice read. Hinton obviously became the superstar and Smolensky wrote long books about linguistics.

Anyone know more about this history?

[1] https://stanford.edu/~jlmcc/papers/PDP/Volume%201/Chap6_PDP8...

Post reply on HN