Live data from Hacker News

Databricks acquires Neon

databricks.com

31–40 of 234 posts

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#31

Hey everyone, I'm an engineer at Neon and I wanted to share this FAQ which covers a lot of the questions that are being brought up in the comments here: https://neon.tech/databricks-faq We're really excited about this, and will try to respond to some of the questions people have here later.

Will there be a statement about the OSS nature of Neon?

I'm also an engineer at Neon. The plan is to continue developing Neon as an Apache-2.0 licensed software.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#33

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

With cookies disabled I get a blank website, which is a massive red flag and an immediate nope from me. Can't imagine someone incapable of building a website would deliver a good (digital) product.

But.. but.... we MUST track you! That's the whole purpose of our site /s

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#34
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[Disclaimer: I work for Xata] As it happens, we've just launched our new Xata platform ( https://xata.io/ ) which has some of the key Neon features: instant copy-on-write branching and separation of storage and compute. As an extra twist, we also can do anonymization (PII masking) between your production database and developer branches. The way we do copy-on-write branches is a bit different. We haven't done any modi…

Is this open source? A major point of Neon is that it's open source and self-hostable.

Several components are open source as their own projects (see below) which will allow you to reproduce most of the features on top of regular Postgres. But the storage part is not open source. We are considering a simpler implementation of it that would be realistic to self-host and still do copy-on-write branching.

These are the open source components:

* pgstream for the anonymization from the production branch

* pgroll for schema changes

* Xata Agent for the LLM-powered optimizations

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#36
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this open source? A major point of Neon is that it's open source and self-hostable.

Several components are open source as their own projects (see below) which will allow you to reproduce most of the features on top of regular Postgres. But the storage part is not open source. We are considering a simpler implementation of it that would be realistic to self-host and still do copy-on-write branching. These are the open source components: * pgstream for the anonymization from the production branch * pg…

I think when people look at Neon, the Aurora-style disaggregated compute/data architecture allowing highly scalable read replicas on cloud storage is the defining feature, and it's the only such project that offers it for Postgres. So the storage part is the point.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#38

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

Is hosting spark really that groundbreaking ? Also isn't spark kind of too complicated for 90% of enterprisey data-processing .

I really don't understand the valuation for this company. Why is it so high.

Re: Databricks acquires Neon

#39

Maybe unrelated but Databricks is the most annoying garbage I have ever had to use. It fascinates me how anyone uses it by choice.

With cookies disabled I get a blank website, which is a massive red flag and an immediate nope from me. Can't imagine someone incapable of building a website would deliver a good (digital) product.

They did build a website though. It even looks pretty nice. The restriction you've placed on yourself just prevents you from viewing it.
Post reply on HN