Live data from Hacker News

Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

twitter.com

31–40 of 148 posts

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#31
Similarly HYTE, mostly known for their PC cases, gives a remarkably detailed insight, both into their cost structure and how they are impacted by tariffs, in this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W_mSOS1Qts&t=1394s

They also address the question of moving their production to the US.

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#32
post #25

I'm guessing a ton of new companies will pop up overnight in India, Taiwan, Vietnam, S Korea that simply purchase components from China and resell them to the US. Not exactly helping anyone.

The executive order came with threats against any country doing that

Yeah and it has no effect because its done by companies not countries. This is gonna continue for a long time. Its an incredible time to be a middle man

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This will happen in Cambodia. They are building a massive amount of factories near Sihanoukville where the Chinese goods will be stamped with « made in Cambodia » and shipped right away to the USA.

A Tariff Holiday in Cambodia you say? heavy surf punk guitar squeals in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vatNMshZVfU

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#35
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The top voted comments I see are all supportive so far. There are a lot of comments asking why they don’t move manufacturing to Seattle. This theme is common among people who don’t understand how manufacturing works right now: They don’t realize that a product like this has many different parts from different places, down to the dozens of little SMT capacitors. You can’t just move the factory and avoid tariffs becaus…

> can’t just move the factory and avoid tariffs because the parts still come from other places Trump has already started blinking on the China tariffs. It would be madness to move operations in the midst of this chaos—you’d immediately be undercut by cheaper competition.

He’s already said they will reduce the tariffs on China. He insisted there will be some tariffs but 145% is too high and it will come down.

A company moving their production anywhere based on what the policy is right now would be foolish because the policy could change in the next 5 mins, but will almost certainly change within minutes if there are empty shelves.

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#36

> https://xcancel.com/WyzeCam/status/1917662183036706849 They’re getting attacked in the replies.

People reply to the “Good morning Vietnam” post with “OK, so the plan is working” and “you'll do in 60 days what you tried to do for a year.”

Who are these people?

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#38

Feels like maybe the tariffs are working if they’re talking about moving their production stateside?

They said they’re looking to “move out of China,” but that almost certainly doesn’t mean the U.S. Probably India or Vietnam, maybe Turkey or Malaysia.

I have seen this comment a lot and don't understand it.

From the U.S.'s point of view there are two goals: increase manufacturing in the States, and reduce manufacturing in China.

Even if they don't choose the States, and even if things aren't near-shored, it is still a pretty big win for the administration, no?

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#39
How much in retail value? I've seen a few small companies that have all their manufacturing operations in China pass on tariffs at cost transparently, and for those that have already adjusted to the current rates, the surcharge is much smaller than I expected (~30%), but I don't know how margins differ by sector.

Re: Wyze pays $255k of tariffs on $167k of floodlights

#40

Could someone explain to an idiot like me what the benefit of this is to the americans?

If they had bought American floodlights they had saved 255k in tarrifs. So if they had paid 200k for the floodlights they would have still been better of.

One could argue, that there might be no American Floodlight Company - well here is the incentive to build one.

Secondly the money isn't lost, it goes to the state. Like a tax, but it is called differently. With this 255k more the state can now subsidise the local floodlight industry.

If anything of the above comes to fruition... That's a different matter...

Post reply on HN