Could be an advanced civilisation sucking all the stars energy into the back of their spaceship.
A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
31–40 of 40 posts
Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#32Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, it certainly didn't happen tomorrow.
in some reference frames, yes.
Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
in some reference frames, yes.
No, not if we've observed it. There are predicted historical events which can be shunted into the future by running away bravely, but if you've seen them happen, you can only change how long ago.
Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#35Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, not if we've observed it. There are predicted historical events which can be shunted into the future by running away bravely, but if you've seen them happen, you can only change how long ago.
not for us, but in some other reference frame.
Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#37Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
not for us, but in some other reference frame.
If by "reference frame" you mean "observer who lives in the past", then yes: the past is sometimes the future of a more distant past.
Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#39 As many as 30 percent of such stars
may quietly collapse into black holes
no supernova required.
where 'such' refers to 25 solar mass stars.Is that a significant contribution to 'dark matter'?
Re: A star appears to have collapsed straight into a black hole without supernova (2017)
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
If by "reference frame" you mean "observer who lives in the past", then yes: the past is sometimes the future of a more distant past.
no, relativity allows for reference frames where the event hasn't happened yet, even though it has happened for you. there's no simultaneous "it has already happened" for all frames.