Earlier quoted context omitted.
See the thing is that if you're knee deep in an unfamiliar system trying to fix it you type "ls" about a dozen times a minute. Adding two unnecessary keystrokes (doubling the length!) not only adds up it makes typos more common. There are some nice conventions though, once you know grep there's egrep, ngrep, etc. Then there's the -stat family, prstat, iostat, vmstat, mpstat, etc. Grep is its own special case, I'm not…
palish has a point to the extent that lsof is so infrequently used that it would do no harm to give it a more descriptive name. Nonetheless, I entirely agree with you about ls, and about sticking to the conventions that have developed around unix.
That said, I kind of like the weird names, esp grep. (Wasn't that in Stranger in a Strange Land or something?)
But I do object to inconsistent options. One example is: mkdir -p a/b/c This will make all three nested directories, if needed; but there is no equivalent: mv -p x a/b/c/y There also isn't: cp -p a/b/c [1]. You have to create the nested destination directories (a/b/c) first.
[1] cp has a -p option, but with a different meaning...
BTW: It would be nice if HackerNews had the `` markdown of Reddit for inline code. There's been a bit of code sharing recently, and I like that in a "hacker" site.