Instead of training on vast amounts of arbitrary data that may lead to hallucinations, wouldn't it be better to train on high-resolution images of the specific subject we want to upscale? For example, using high-resolution modern photos of a building to enhance an old photo of the same building, or using a family album of a person to upscale an old image of that person. Does such an approach exist?
Author here -- Generally in single image super-resolution, we want to learn a prior over natural high-resolution images, and for that a large and diverse training set is beneficial. Your suggestion sounds interesting, though it's more reminiscent of multi image super-resolution, where additional images contribute additional information, that has to be registered appropriately. That said, our approach is actually trai…
Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
31–40 of 59 posts
Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#32I'd like to see the results in something like Wing Commander Privateer.
Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#33Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#34Was anyone else expecting an infinitely zoomable pictures from that title? I am disappoint
Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not disagreeing, but the number of parameters are listed in the single digit millions size (which surprised me). So, I would expect this to be very fast on modern hardware.
Very fast is a bit vague in a space where you might have a millisecond per frame.
Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#36Instead of training on vast amounts of arbitrary data that may lead to hallucinations, wouldn't it be better to train on high-resolution images of the specific subject we want to upscale? For example, using high-resolution modern photos of a building to enhance an old photo of the same building, or using a family album of a person to upscale an old image of that person. Does such an approach exist?
Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#37hrm. on nature portrait photography 600x600 upscale, it has a LOT of artifacts. Perhaps too far out of distribution? That said, your examples are promising, and thank you for posting a HF space to try it out!
Hi, author here :) It shouldn’t be OOD, unless its too noisy maybe? And what scaling factor did you use? Single image SR is a highly ill-posed problem, so at higher upscaling factors it just becomes really difficult…
Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#38Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#39I'd like to see the results in something like Wing Commander Privateer.
Try it yourself. Here is the demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/prs-eth/thera
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wing_Commander:_Privateer#/med...
Re: Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution with Neural Heat Fields
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very fast is a bit vague in a space where you might have a millisecond per frame.
I doubt that this is a technique for real-time applications. They don't say anything about that on the website.