31–35 of 35 posts
Why not keep both?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
“shaking the narrative” What narrative? Their narrative?
The translation above is really bad. It was probably supposed to be "shaping the narrative", not "shaking". In my opinion, this translation is much closer to the original: "We had been contemplating leaving X for quite some time. We observed the growing presence of fake, troll accounts that increasingly steer the narrative on this platform. We saw that X not only fails to combat but actually promotes hateful and disi…
So the solution is to move to another platform, where the narrative is more easily steered?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
“shaking the narrative” What narrative? Their narrative?
The translation above is really bad. It was probably supposed to be "shaping the narrative", not "shaking". In my opinion, this translation is much closer to the original: "We had been contemplating leaving X for quite some time. We observed the growing presence of fake, troll accounts that increasingly steer the narrative on this platform. We saw that X not only fails to combat but actually promotes hateful and disi…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but they have no Courage Said the warrior from their 20 minute old throwaway account.
The elites and newspapers can say a lot of things that normal people cannot. Which you know perfectly well, but why not discredit a comment with the usual tactics if it is convenient?