I noticed quite a few spelling and grammar mistakes - could do with a bit of an edit pass?
In the current days of AI I think spelling and grammar mistakes is perhaps a great way to tell it is still written by human...... ( Until AI copy this )
We were wrong about GPUs
31–40 of 604 posts
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#32For simple inference, its too expensive for a project that makes no money. Which is most projects.
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#33We wrote all sorts of stuff this week and this is what gets to the front page. :P
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#34> GPUs terrified our security team. Ha ha, it didn't terrify Modal. It ships with all those security problems, and pretends it doesn't have them. Sorry Eric.
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#35Not sure about this: > like with our portfolio of IPv4 addresses, I’m even more comfortable making bets backed by tradable assets with durable value. Is that referencing the gpus, the hardware? If yes, why should they have a durable value? Historically hardware like that deprecated fast and reaches a value of 0, energy efficiency alone kills e.g. old server hardware. Something different here?
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#36We wrote all sorts of stuff this week and this is what gets to the front page. :P
You just wrote a blog post about whats needed for a top HN post. You should have known it would do well :) https://fly.io/blog/a-blog-if-kept/
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#37Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#38We wrote all sorts of stuff this week and this is what gets to the front page. :P
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#39Has service reliability improved at all? I tried Fly at two different points in time and I’ve never had a worse experience with a service.
Re: We were wrong about GPUs
#40Google and AWS helpfully offered their managed LLM AI services, but they don't really have anything terribly more useful than just machines with GPUs. Which are expensive.
I'm going to check fly.io...