Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't ban. Tax. Never ban. Tax low capacity flights more. That both reduces the number of flights and raises money which can be put toward paying ATCs more and increasing the headcount. You then have a lever available to dial up and down to further reduce flights / raise money. Banning is expensive and increases legislative and judicial burden. Taxing is a much more efficient way to stop people doing things. You have…
Careless and hamfisted taxing/banning of "private jets" can have the unintended effect of also killing light piston general aviation, flight instruction, and the whole pipeline of training the next generation of airline pilots. Flight training is almost always low capacity (one-on-one) so uncarefuly-crafted legislation could catch it in the blast radius. Piloting is already one of the more expensive careers to train…
America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
31–40 of 660 posts
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#32I wonder what the software UX is like for ATC, and if there's room for improvement? Is the software/hardware ancient? I'd hope that it is absolutely rock solid but knowing big custom projects I'm not very hopeful!
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#33Seems like a colossal error to have asked them all to quit. I wonder -- if half of the air traffic controllers took the offer to leave their jobs, do we have a Plan B? The deadline they have been given to decide is Thursday; I have not seen any communication as to whether ATC (and TSA, etc.) will be operational Friday.
In theory you could do what Reagan did and tell the military to do ATC.
Whether or not this is a good idea is another matter.
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#34Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#35How many of those nerds who role play as air traffic controllers on flight simulations at home qualified to do it for real? How much extra training would they need?
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#36I fear this will lead to Trump pushing OpenAI to use AI for air traffic controllers, which is going to result in a lot of deaths. Could AI eventually do the job? Maybe, but it will be a bloody road to get there.
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#371: https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/bay-area-airport-losing-...
2: https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/san-carlos-airport-reach...
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#38Seems like a colossal error to have asked them all to quit. I wonder -- if half of the air traffic controllers took the offer to leave their jobs, do we have a Plan B? The deadline they have been given to decide is Thursday; I have not seen any communication as to whether ATC (and TSA, etc.) will be operational Friday.
> if half of the air traffic controllers took the offer to leave their jobs, do we have a Plan B? In theory you could do what Reagan did and tell the military to do ATC. Whether or not this is a good idea is another matter.
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#39Seems like a colossal error to have asked them all to quit. I wonder -- if half of the air traffic controllers took the offer to leave their jobs, do we have a Plan B? The deadline they have been given to decide is Thursday; I have not seen any communication as to whether ATC (and TSA, etc.) will be operational Friday.
ATC already couldn’t work remotely. The only people who would take a deal like this would be people who were thinking about quitting or retiring anyway. I suspect ATC will not be substantially affected by people taking that deal.
Re: America desperately needs more air traffic controllers
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
From what I understand, if they are over 30 and have less than 20/20 vision, they aren’t qualified.
Seems like a problem to me; nearsightedness is becoming more and more common.